NY charter schools’ success, Letters

Charter champion

The Post’s recent editorial provides yet more evidence of the superior performance of charter schools in New York (“Fresh Proof NY Needs More Charters,” Jan. 16).

When I was an undergraduate, I was fortunate to take a course taught by a professor who was an early advocate of charter schools, as well as educational vouchers for parents to use in private schools. The professor posed this question: Should parents or the government have the fundamental right — and corresponding responsibility — to provide for the education of children?

The answer reveals a great deal. If your answer is with the parents, then you are more likely to support charter schools and educational vouchers, because they give parents the financial ability to choose what is best for their kids. If your answer is the government, you accept “failing” public schools.

James E. Ciecka, Chicago, Ill.

Stuffed courts

Thank you for highlighting examples of all the frivolous litigation winding through our court system (“Crazy cases from bad to (vers)us,” Jan. 17).

Our courthouses have turned into a vehicle for preposterous claims and get-rich-quick schemes. In this particular case, a woman sued Geico, which insured her partner’s car, for contracting an STD.

Legislators should work to stem the proliferation of absurd and cynical tort claims by adopting the British “loser pays” rule. If litigants and their attorneys bring unsuccessful tort claims, they should be required to pay the costs incurred in defending those claims. Such a rule would force attorneys and potential clients to think long and hard before signing on to flimsy lawsuits.

Peter Janoff, Stamford, Conn.

‘Royaled out’

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were reportedly disappointed with the recent Emmy results, which snubbed their Netflix series (“Meanwhile, Emmy-loser Sussex sulk,” Jan. 18).

The snub is likely due to a widespread case of Harry and Meghan fatigue. Like the strident, repetitive blather from talking heads on Election Day, most viewers are willing to watch and listen for only so long. Eventually, they’ll change the channel or turn off the television.

There are too many quality shows to choose from right now. The couple’s drama has become monotonous. It’s about as interesting as radio static.

Vincent Ruggiero, Scottsdale, Ariz.

Z is for Zombie

It would seem that the kids today have collectively turned their backs on the American Dream (“Today’s kids have no drive,” Jan. 18).

Getting a job and a driver’s license — benchmarks once considered a rite of passage for American teenagers — is no longer a priority for Gen Z.

Perhaps contemporary life has been too easy for them. Parental support, combined with services like Uber and DoorDash, has made the need for a job and license almost obsolete. Add to that the legalization of marijuana, virtual reality video games and AI, and you start to think the kids should really be called: Gen Z(ombies).

Jack Kaufman, Naples, Fla.

Crime critics

I was so sorry to read about the newsstand vendors getting robbed and assaulted in Manhattan (“Newsstand Nightmares,” Jan. 15).

I hope that the “defund the police” pundits read that story. They might then stop thinking they know more about fighting crime than the police.

John Francis Fox, Queens

Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Carl Heastie ignores what his voters want on crime and charter schools

One of the reasons people are cynical about politics is because their elected representatives show more allegiance to their personal interests and lobbyists than their own constituents. 

Too many politicians are like an abusive partner who swears it’ll be different this time if we just give him or her one more chance.

It’s abundantly clear what the citizens in New York state Assemblyman Carl Heastie’s district have advocated for, but Heastie’s window into the desires of the people he represents has been replaced with a mirror.

In a McLaughlin & Associates poll commissioned by The Post within Heastie’s northern Bronx district, out of the 400 likely voters surveyed last week, 62% said they support charters, and 68% indicated an interest in increasing the number of charter schools.

Many of the poll respondents also stated that crime is the top issue in their community, and 64% approve of requiring anyone committing a crime with a gun to be held without bail.

Despite a markedly low 46% positive opinion of New York City public schools and majority support for charter schools in Heastie’s district, there are only four charter schools located in Williamsbridge, Eastchester and Wakefield.

But if Carl Heastie is working against the people he’s suppose to represent, who is he actually working for?

Does he work for the massive New York City teachers’ unions and affiliates who’ve donated a combined $146,000 to Heastie and another $1.3 million to the state Democratic committees? 

What sway has the $80 million in special-interest money had over his decision-making when it comes to the success and safety of the families within his district?


A crowd made up of parents, students, teachers and school administrators gather by City Hall in Manhattan to demand the expansion of charter schools in NYC.
Stephen Yang

Our cynicism is legitimate when our political system encourages and rewards quid pro quo corruption, exudes overt favoritism for middleman lobbying firms and corporate juggernauts and preserves positions of governmental authority for the most immoral characters simply because of their connections to the donor class.

The lack of educational success and general safety for our children will always come at a cost when someone else can outspend our concerns. 

Politicians like Heastie are not willing to risk losing a re-election by going against the demands of his financial donors to do right by you.

Heastie’s primary interest, like most politicians, is to stay in power and succumbing to the interests of common people isn’t nearly as important as succumbing to the interests of organizations that are deemed “special.”

This is especially true in a state like New York where Democrats could get a ham sandwich elected, given their huge registered voter advantage. They need not fear the voter.


There are only four charter schools located in Williamsbridge, Eastchester and Wakefield.
Stephen Yang

An organization or individual with an abundance of money can dictate the direction of an entire community that they don’t personally live in, and politicians like Heastie play as the enforcers of their political demands.

Even worse, politicians like Heastie will get away with this irreverent attitude towards the public because they know we’re too busy trying to survive in an increasingly tumultuous environment that they had a hand in creating.

Emotional pleas, common sense and polling data won’t be enough to get Heastie to stop blocking charter-school expansion and bail reform. If you want him to his shift positions, you’ll have to treat him like Cuba Gooding Jr. in the movie “Jerry Maguire”: Show him the money.

Adam B. Coleman is the author of Black Victim to Black Victor” and founder of Wrong Speak Publishing. Follow him on Substack: adambcoleman.substack.com.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Parents want charters because schools are for kids, not unions — politicians, wake up!

As if state legislators and union leaders fearmongering about charter-school costs weren’t enough, Mayor Eric Adams, when he should be championing the city’s kids, is instead caving and joining that crowd.

There’s no reality to charter schools costing $1 billion extra in any foreseeable future, but that doesn’t stop the ridiculous narrative against the increasingly popular schools. If anything, outlays should be reduced, since district schools’ per-student cost is significantly higher than for students at the charter schools New Yorkers want.

New York City’s Asian Americans want more charter schools. So do the Big Apple’s blacks, Hispanics and whites. Public district schools have become increasingly brazen about dumbing down standards, which is why families seeking better options welcomed Gov. Kathy Hochul’s budget proposal that included a plan to enable more charter schools to open in New York City.


Eighty-eight percent and 91% of city charter schools outperform district schools in English and math, respectively.
Angel Chevrestt

It’s hard to go to a parents’ gathering without hearing their complaints about district schools, their anguish over the poor options and stories of how they or their friends left or are planning to leave the system — whether to charter schools, parochial schools, private schools or outside the city entirely.

Charter schools deliver better results by a wide margin: 88% and 91% of city charter schools outperform district schools in English and math, respectively, and significantly so.

A recent survey found that nearly two-thirds of New York City parents view charter schools favorably and want the charter cap lifted. As if more evidence were needed, district-school enrollment has continued to plunge while charter enrollment keeps growing.

In the long run, the demand requires lifting the charter cap itself. But the short-term solutions in Hochul’s plan should relieve some immediate pressure. Moving 85 unused allocations from upstate into the city and allowing 21 “zombie” schools’ charters to be reallocated would mean dozens of new charter schools. Some charters, already approved by the State University of New York but unable to open because of the cap, could offer students spots quickly.

Hochul’s proposal is all the more remarkable because it defies the powerful teachers union. District schools are unionized; most charter schools are not, which is why union bosses hate them.


The primary complaint of the state plan for more charter schools was that more charter schools would divert resources away from district schools.
Getty Images

The day after Hochul announced her plan, key education state Sens. Shelley Mayer, John Liu and Robert Jackson denounced it. A City Hall rally followed. Tellingly, United Federation of Teachers boss Mike Mulgrew was a featured denunciator. The primary complaint was that under the city funding formula — under which funding follows students — more charter schools would divert resources away from district schools.

But that’s a ruse to protect union jobs.

A student fleeing a failing district school for a charter school does not “divert” resources from the losing district school any more than if he fled for another district school. Yet only the first is condemned — because only the first hurts union jobs. Charter schools are public schools; in either scenario, the student and his funding remain in the public-school system. If anything, charter schools help the city retain students and their funding: They’d otherwise flee the public-school system, the city or the state altogether.

The problem is not students fleeing failing district schools; it’s the failing district schools. Don’t scapegoat charter schools; learn from them!

For New York’s Asian Americans, the need for good charter schools is especially resonant. Asian Americans with traditional Confucian ideals — and strong opposition to Marxist-Communist ones — appreciate meritocracy’s importance in uniting diverse peoples. They value testing and excellence, not participation trophies or dumbing down. They value duty, obligation and responsibility, not narcissism, fragility and entitlement. They value study, hard work and delayed gratification. On average, Asian high-school kids spend twice as much time per week doing homework than white kids and four times as much as black kids.


Kathy Hochul’s budget proposal included a plan to enable more charter schools to open in New York City.
AP

Yet in district schools, all these values are openly mocked, condemned as deviant, to be corrected by “social emotional learning” — a form of medicalization. But Asian-American values find support in successful charter schools. Charter schools now serve mostly black and Hispanic neighborhoods, but Asians also want new charter schools near their communities.

This is a time to show courage. Deal-cutting for the budget makes charter schools a bargaining chip. Legislators also fear the union’s wrath. But the union has displayed greater than usual self-interest the last few years, making families and taxpayers say: Enough, we’re out, we’re voting with our feet and taxes. That will take a new budget to address! 

Elected officials, especially those standing shoulder-to-shoulder with union bosses, must remember taxpayers fund schools to serve students, not unions. Once they get that, only one conclusion is possible: They must support more charter schools. It’s time for legislators, the mayor and the governor to show courage and do their duty to New York families. 

Wai Wah Chin is the founding president of the Chinese American Citizens Alliance Greater New York and an adjunct fellow of the Manhattan Institute.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version