Where to Watch the Oscars 2023 Best Picture Nominations (And What Order to Watch Them)

The 2023 Oscars are less than a week away, which means you have just a few days to catch up on the 2023 Best Picture nominations. You don’t want to be the only one at your Oscars watch party on Sunday night that isn’t laughing at host Jimmy Kimmel’s no-doubt hilarious monologue.

But let’s be realistic: Ten movies is a lot to watch in one week. For those of us with jobs, families, and lives, it’s nearly impossible. Once upon a time, you only had to watch five movies to keep up with the best films of the year—at least, according to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science. But ever since the Oscars revised its rules in 2011 to include 10 Best Picture slots, it’s gotten more and more difficult for procrastinators to fit in a last-minute Oscars cram session.

Not to worry, though, because Decider is here to help. In an effort to help you cut down on the noise, Decider has assembled a list of the 2023 Best Picture nominees, ordered by how dire it is that you watch each title. Below, you can find information on where you can watch the film, and why you may want to prioritize (or not) seeing each film before the Oscars.

Thankfully, in the era of streaming, it’s easier and cheaper than ever to watch Oscar-nominated movies. Frontrunner Everything, Everywhere, All At Once, for example, is streaming free on Paramount+, while Steven Spielberg’s The Fabelmans is available to rent for just $5.99.


1

Photo: Everett Collection

If you told me in March 2022 that Everything, Everywhere, All At Once—a movie that features Jamie Lee Curtis with hot dog fingers and a fairly explicit butt plug joke—would be the frontrunner for Best Picture, I would have assumed you were a traveler from a bizarre ultimate universe. But against all odds—and likely thanks to Academy’s continuing efforts to expand its membership to be less old, less white, and less male— this weird, heartfelt, oddity of a movie is favored to take home the top prize at the 95th Academy Awards. Even if this wacky take on the multiverse isn’t for you, Everything, Everywhere is the movie to watch if you want to be part of this year’s Oscar conversation. If you have time for one, make it this one.

Streaming on: Paramount+, Showtime, or buy on digital for $19.99


2

Photo: Focus Features/Courtesy Everett Collection

Although it’s (sadly) unlikely that Tár will take home Best Picture on Sunday night, you still make this masterful drama about a problematic composer a priority. It’s still a toss-up between Michelle Yeoh and Cate Blanchett for Best Actress, but whether or not she wins a statue, Lydia Tár is going down in cinematic history as one of the best performances of Blanchett’s career. Plus, it’s just a really good movie. Written and directed by Todd Field, it’s a brilliant commentary on art, gender, power, and abuse that will compel you every step of the way. You won’t regret watching it.

Streaming on: Peacock Premium, or buy on digital for $19.99, rent for $5.99


3

Photo: ©Searchlight Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection

Don’t count Martin McDonagh’s darkly comedic drama about a friendship break-up, The Banshees of Inisherin, out of the Best Picture running just yet. With eight Oscar nominations—including acting nominations for the entire cast, and two Best Supporting Actor nods, for Brendan Gleeson and Barry Keoghan—this Irish movie could easily be a wild-card winner. Plus, with so many nominations, you’ll be covering a lot of Oscar ground by watching this one. Definitely turn out captions before you stream it on HBO Max, because those Irish accents are thick, and when you’re left confused by the ending, go ahead and give Decider’s analysis of The Banshees of Inisherin ending explained a read.

Streaming on: HBO Max, or buy on digital for $9.99


4

Photo: ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection

Though the odds of Steven Spielberg taking home the top prize on Sunday aren’t quite as high, it’s still very possible that we’ll see a Fabelmans Best Picture win at the 95th Academy Awards. If you’re a Gen Xer who grew up on Spielberg movies, you’ll probably want to move this family drama—based on Spielberg’s own childhood as an aspiring filmmaker—higher up on your watch list. It’s a perfectly inoffensive, run-of-the-mill biopic, but if you’re not a Spielberg mega fan, you may find yourself bored throughout the two-and-a-half-hour runtime. All respect to Spielberg, a great director, but this movie is hardly his finest work, and, unlike his most famous movies, probably won’t go down as an essential in film history. That said, it’s still essential to the 2023 Oscars.

Streaming on: Buy on digital for $9.99, rent for $5.99


5

Photo: Everett Collection

Though the Academy failed to name a single woman on the list of Best Director nominations, they at least honored Sarah Polly’s critically acclaimed drama with Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay nominations. (The film is adapted from the 2018 novel of the same name by Miriam Toews, which in turn was based on a real-life isolated Mennonite community in Bolivia.) Out of ten films, it’s the only Best Picture nomination directed by a woman, but that’s not the only reason you should watch it. It’s a quiet but fierce conversation about what, exactly, women are supposed to do when they are betrayed by the men in their life, featuring some of the best performances of the year.

Streaming on: Buy on digital for $19.99, rent for $5.99


6

Photo: ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

All eyes and ears are on Austin Butler, to see whether the actor will deliver an acceptance speech in his Elvis Presley voice when he most likely wins the Oscar for Best Actor. It’s down to Butler or Brendan Fraser, but given that The Whale isn’t up for Best Picture, if you care about the Best Actor race, go ahead and give this wild Elvis Presley biopic from Baz Luhrmann a stream. The movie was not well-liked by critics, but that didn’t stop it from crushing the box office. Plus, you don’t want to miss out on the most meme-able movie moment of 2022, courtesy of Tom Hanks: “He’s white?!”

Streaming on: HBO Max, or buy on digital for $19.99, rent for $5.99


7

Photo: ©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection

Top Gun: Maverick probably won’t win at the Oscars this year, and star Tom Cruise will be crying all the way to the bank with his No. 1 domestic box office hit. Statistically speaking, you’ve probably already seen this long-awaited sequel. But it really is a fun watch— a simple story that honors the emotional narrative of the first film and is honestly far better than it needs to be. That said, if you’re out of time before the Oscars, you can skip this one and likely guess what you’re missing. Use context clues for Jimmy Kimmel’s monologue jokes, and you’ll be just fine.

Streaming on: Paramount+ , or buy on digital for $19.99, rent for $5.99


8

Photo: Netflix

Netflix doesn’t have nearly as strong a showing in the Best Picture race as it has the past few years, but the streamer can at least claim one nomination, and that’s this modern adaptation of All Quiet on the Western Front, the world-renowned 1929 German novel by Erich Maria Remarque about World War I. Though it’s not looking good for a Best Picture win, it seems likely that the movie, directed by Edward Berger, will win Best International Feature. With a higher film resolution and a lot more resources, this version of All Quiet on the Western Front feels even more accurate to the horrors of World War I than the book or the 1930 film—so make sure you’re mentally prepared for that.

Streaming on: Netflix


9

Photo: Courtesy Everett Collection

Triangle of Sadness is one of those wildcard Best Picture nominations that almost definitely isn’t going to win anything and probably shouldn’t have even been nominated in the first place. Sometimes these wildcard entries highlight hidden gems, but unfortunately, that’s not the case with this dark “eat the rich” satire from Swedish filmmaker Ruben Östlund. Unless you’re fond of watching excruciating vomit-and-diarrhea sequences, you can move this movie to the bottom of your watch list.

Streaming on: Hulu, or buy on digital for $7.99, rent for $3.99


10

Photo: Everett Collection

If you haven’t gone to see Avatar 2 in theaters at this point, it’s likely because you aren’t very interested in watching Avatar 2. And if that’s the case, I see no reason to subject yourself to this expensive, three-hour spectacle simply for the sake of the Academy Awards. Sure, The Way of Water is a lock for the Best Visual Effects Oscar. But trust us, you won’t lose any points among film nerds at your Oscars watch-party for skipping this one. Also? It’s not available on streaming!

Streaming on: Nowhere, yet! Find a theatrical showing near you via Fandango.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Grammy 2023 snubs and surprises, from Beyoncé to Taylor Swift

Somehow after Beyoncé became the winningest artist in Grammy history with 32 gramophones, she still managed to come off as a loser — yet again — when Harry Styles’ “Harry’s House” won Album of the Year over B’s “Renaissance.”

But — deep breath — how could Beyoncé still not have an Album of the Year gramophone after four nominations, when she should already have at least two?

Her game-changing surprise self-titled set lost to Beck’s “Morning Phase” in 2015, and “Lemonade” — one of the best albums of the century — bowed out to Adele’s “25” in 2017.

But the Queen B wasn’t the only artist to get snubbed — or pull a surprise — at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles on Sunday night. Here, we look back on some of the other major shockers on music’s biggest night.


Beyonce became the winningest artist of the Grammys with her 32nd award tonight — but that fact wasn’t enough to beat Harry Styles for Album of the Year.

Snub: Taylor Swift


Taylor Swift took home an award for Best Music Video, but was shut out of both Song of the Year and Best Country Song.
Variety via Getty Images

Yes, T-Swizzle — who dutifully showed up to the awards even though she (and everybody else) knows that 2024 is really her year— won Best Music Video for “All Too Well: The Short Film,” she failed to pick up gramophones for either Song of the Year or Best Country Song for the tunes that were nominated for her re-recorded versions of “Red” and “I Bet You Think About Me.” While this has been a great move for Swift from a principal and pocketbook standpoint, it’s not exactly what the Record Academy wants to award yet with so much truly new music out there.

Surprise: Bonnie Raitt


A shocked Bonnie Raitt takes in the applause.
CBS

Who doesn’t love Bonnie Raitt? But when you’re competing against the likes of Adele, Beyoncé, Harry Styles, Kendrick Lamar, Taylor Swift and Lizzo — all superstars at the top of their game — it just doesn’t make any kind of sense that the 73-year-old would win Song of the Year for “Just Like That” — a tune that most people (like, almost everybody) haven’t even heard.

Surprise: Muni Long


Sorry, who? Muni Long beat out legend Mary J. Blige — among other big names — for Best R&B Performance.
Getty Images for The Recording A

Um…who is Muni Long? Well, hopefully the world will get hip to this R&B singer-songwriter after she beat out not only Grammy winners Mary J. Blige and Jazmine Sullivan but Beyoncé — let’s repeat that, Beyoncé — for Best R&B Performance for “Hrs & Hrs.” Proof that the Grammys are not, indeed, rigged — expect to see her streams go through the roof tomorrow.

Snub: Mary J. Blige


Something is wrong with a system that shuts out Mary J. Blige, who deserved to win for her album “Good Morning Gorgeous.”
Getty Images for The Recording A

Wait a minute — so Mary J. Blige, the indisputable Queen of Hip-Hop Soul, was nominated for Album of the Year for “Good Morning Gorgeous” for only the second time in her career (after 2005’s “The Breakthrough”), she lost out to neo-jazzman Robert Glasper — a worthy winner in his own right — for “Black Radio III.” But when you are nominated for Album of the Year and you can’t even win in your own genre category — especially a deserving diva such as MJB — something is wrong with the system.

Surprise: Madonna


Madonna presented the much ballyhooed performance of “Unholy” by Sam Smith and Kim Petras.
CBS

When you’re the Queen of Pop, you only step out to present awards when it really means something to you. And after all of her work and representation for the LGBTQ community over the years, Madonna sure was the perfect person to present the performance of non-binary artist Sam Smith and trans singer Kim Petras — who had already become the first trans performer to win a Grammy when their “Unholy” won Best Pop Duo/Group Performance earlier in the night. Certainly, it made sense that Madonna is reminding folks about her own impact last as a fierce LGBTQ ally as she gets set to launch her “The Celebration Tour” honoring her 40th anniversary in music later this year.

Surprise: Samara Joy


Bronx-born jazz singer Samara Joy was a surprise winner for Best New Artist at the Grammys on Sunday night.
CBS

It was a pretty open field for Best New Artist year, with no clear favorite among a motley crew that ranged from buzzy indie duo Wet Leg to Brazilian star Anitta. At the end of the day, the edge seemed to go Italian glam rockers Maneskin for perfectly playing the industry game — and helping to revive a dying genre. But a 23-year-old jazz vocalist from The Bronx somehow, who has been compared to Sarah Vaughan, surprised everyone in one of the night’s biggest shockers.

Surprise: Bad Bunny


Bad Bunny opened the 2023 Grammys with a historic performance.
Getty Images for The Recording A

Was it going to be Adele? Was it going to be Harry Styles? Or was it going to be the ever-elusive Beyoncé opening the 65th annual Grammy Awards at Crypto.com Arena — opening the first time the show has been held in LA since COVID shut the world down? But the primo placement went to Puerto Rican sensation Bad Bunny, who made history with “Un Verano Sin Ti,” the first Spanish-language LP to be nominated for Album of the Year. Kicking off his medley of “El Apagon” and “Despues De La Playa,” he brought the fiesta through the audience — no social distancing in 2023! — Bad Bunny made up for his no-show at last November’s American Music Awards, where he was the top nominee. While he could have went a little harder on wardrobe — his white t-shirt and jeans made him look like he was still in rehearsals — he got the party started after a semi-slow start. His festive if somewhat chaotic performance got Taylor Swift, Jack Harlow and even 93-year-old Motown founder Berry Gordy out of their seats.

Surprise: Beyonce ties the record stuck in traffic


Nile Rogers (inset green) accepted Beyonce’s award for Best R&B Song (“Cuff It”).
NBCU Photo Bank

When Beyoncé tied the record for the most Grammy wins ever, she was — in true diva fashion — late showing up to the awards at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles.

But seriously, CBS, weren’t they supposed to wait for her to arrive?

Still, when Viola Davis — who had already made history herself by becoming an EGOT by winning a Grammy for Best Audio Book, Narration, and Storytelling for the audio book of her memoir, “Finding Me” — presented the award for Best R&B Song to a no-show Beyoncé, who was apparently stuck in LA traffic, it was one of the all-time diva moments.

The legendary Nile Rodgers, who co-wrote and plays guitar on “Cuff It,” helped to make up for it with an emotional speech that made it all good.

Snub: Diana Ross

The 78-year-old Motown queen — who somehow has been underrated and underappreciated as an artist over a supreme six decades — had never won a competitive Grammy in her legendary career, despite 12 nominations. The streak sadly continued with her unlucky 13th nomination (Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album for “Thank You”) on Sunday night.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version