Congress dithered while US withered

A line from legendary manager Casey Stengel fits the moment: “Can’t anybody here play this game?” He was talking about his hapless 1962 New York Mets, but the damning question can be fairly directed to both political parties and Washington itself.

In one of the most worrisome signs of our era, the federal government has never been larger, richer and wielded more power over the lives of citizens. The size, debt and reach are astounding when compared to just a generation ago.

Yet that bejeweled behemoth is failing miserably at many of its most basic duties. Public safety, border security, stable prices and quality public education are in decline, leaving many Americans angry about their government and cynical about the people who run it.

With little regard to the party of the president, polls in recent years consistently show only about three in 10 respondents believe the country is on the right track. More damning, a large Pew study last year revealed an enormous trust deficit.

Just two in 10 Americans believe the federal government does what it should, a low point in a decades-long decline. When the question was first asked in 1958, nearly 75% said they trusted the feds to do the right thing all or most of the time.

It is hard to imagine those days ever returning, with events of last week vividly demonstrating that both parties are hellbent on squandering the little goodwill that remains.

House Republicans amped up their bid to make conservatism a punchline as their inability to promptly choose a speaker made history in all the wrong ways.

Tensions rose in the House Chamber when voting seemed to stall.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

What should have been a feel-good, routine process to kick off a new Congress turned into a bloody slog, with Kevin McCarthy needing 15 roll-call votes over four days to eke out a narrow majority.

When the end finally came about 12:30 a.m. Saturday, it felt more like a mercy rule conclusion than a victory, with McCarthy looking like he needs a vacation before starting work.

Wall-to-wall TV coverage captured the stomach-churning ways the sausage was made, with the process showing intraparty pettiness and anger that obscured some substantive disagreements over how power would be shared. Midterm voters who gave the GOP a narrow majority certainly didn’t believe they would get a civil war before a single vote was taken on their behalf.

Democrats made no effort to mask their pleasure, and why should they? They united behind their leader, Brooklyn’s Hakeem Jeffries, in every round of voting, turning GOP squabbling into comic relief.

Welcome WH distraction

migrants
President Biden is set to visit the border for the first time in two years on Sunday.
John Moore/Getty Images

Dems also understood that every minute Republicans spent on the shootout in a lifeboat was a minute stolen from any serious probes of the Biden administration. As it turned out, the GOP frittered away a week in an internal struggle that should have been resolved in the two months since the election.

One inadvertent effect is that the self-neutered GOP copied the House habits of the last two years under Dem control. As Republican James Comer of Kentucky said in a fiery Friday afternoon nomination of McCarthy before the 13th ballot, the House never held a single oversight hearing on the millions who illegally crossed the border or the chaotic and deadly withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Nor did it examine the origin of COVID-19 or the Biden family’s foreign business. He pledged to probe all that and more as head of the Oversight panel — as soon as a Speaker was chosen.

The speech drew loud GOP applause, but failed to put McCarthy over the top. So the crucial probes remained on hold.

Although some of the holdouts demanded changes that smack of personal advantages and perks, others had more important concerns. Chief among these was fixing a corrupt budget-making process where leaders of both houses and parties jam virtually all spending into a gigantic bill, with members expected to vote yes without having time to read or debate it.

In his concessions to the holdouts, McCarthy sensibly vowed to end the practice, which is a major cause of the nation’s soaring debt.

Even before we know whether that and other changes will make a meaningful difference, we already know the speaker fights raised fresh doubts the GOP will accomplish anything significant. A four-seat majority doesn’t leave much margin for dissent and the wasted week reinforced the party’s image of being too divided to govern.

Hundreds of residents and activists marched in El Paso, Texas, on Jan. 7 ahead of President Biden’s visit.
Andres Leighton/AP

Meanwhile, the Biden White House proved again that it, too, doesn’t have a clue about good governance as it staged a series of strange events to draw sharp contrasts with the House hijinks.

The president, with Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell in tow, visited Kentucky to tout the bloated bipartisan infrastructure bill, a public relations coup for Biden that earned McConnell barbs from The Wall Street Journal editorial page and other conservatives.

Biden’s border bluster

On Thursday, Biden tried again to impersonate an active president by announcing a plan to deal with Cubans, Nicaraguans, Haitians and Venezuelans who come to the border. Under his order, they must apply for asylum from their home nation or a safe haven and he will admit 30,000 a month on a “parole” program.

As with Biden’s border policies for the last two years, this one is a head-scratcher. Hopefully, legal challenges will scuttle it as an overreach.

Besides, the Border Patrol reports that out of 234,000 November encounters with migrants, about 90,000 were from the four countries Biden cited.

What about the other 144,000 from other countries? And what about the hundreds of thousands of “got aways,” those who cross and disappear without encountering agents? Who knows?

Certainly not Biden, with a highlight of his remarks being another instance of his calling the vice president “President Harris.”

Biden speaks on Jan. 6 during a ceremony to mark the second anniversary of the Capitol riot.
Patrick Semansky/AP

The main point was to show he was doing public business while the GOP was eating its own, a point he will reinforce Sunday when he finally visits the border.

Biden was at it again Friday, too, holding a ceremony on the second anniversary of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. The ostensible purpose was to honor police and others for their conduct that day, but the real purpose was to remind the public about Donald Trump and what Biden calls an “insurrection” carried out by “MAGA Republicans.”

It was a hyper-partisan event, where the president repeated his false claim that defenders “gave their lives” that day. In fact, the only person who died on Jan. 6 was an unarmed protestor shot and killed by a Capitol police officer.

Such distortions highlight a cause of the decline in public trust. When officials of both parties speak in coded ways designed only for core supporters, there is no appeal to people not committed to a partisan camp. The result is the deep and bitter polarization that leaves little space for any American seeking both common sense and common ground.

Unfortunately, Washington offers very little of either these days.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

US helped Ukraine target Russian generals, sink Moskva: book

American intelligence agencies gave highly sensitive data to the Ukrainian armed forces that allowed them to track and kill a dozen Russian generals and sink the Russian flagship Moskva, a new book reveals — despite strident administration denials.

A “furious” President Joe Biden gave “presidential tongue-lashings” to CIA chief Bill Burns and other top aides in May after leakers told NBC News and the New York Times that Ukrainians had been given real-time intelligence from US sources.

“He didn’t like what he considered to be publicly taunting the Russians,” White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain told author Chris Whipple in the forthcoming book “The Fight of His Life,” out Jan. 17.

The reports of secret streams of real-time battlefield intelligence drew a furious response from the Kremlin — and instant repudiation from the Pentagon, the National Security Council, and Biden’s press office.

“We do not provide intelligence with the intent to kill Russian generals,” NSC spokesperson Adrienne Wilson said May 5.

President Biden was reportedly “furious” that leakers told media outlets that the US shared intelligence with Ukraine.
AP
Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki denied that the US shared intelligence that helped Ukraine sink the Moskva.
LUIS ACOSTA/AFP via Getty Images

“We did not provide Ukraine with specific targeting information for the Moskva,” insisted Jen Psaki, then the White House’s press secretary. “We were not involved in the Ukrainians’ decision to strike the ship or in the operation they carried out.”

The Post has obtained a copy of the book, which contains a string of revelations about Biden’s disastrous pullout from Afghanistan and other incidents from the first two years of his administration.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Biden admin pushed to ban Twitter users for COVID ‘disinformation’

The Biden White House pressured Twitter to both “elevate” and “suppress” purported COVID-19 “misinformation” — but ended up “censoring info that was true but inconvenient” to policy makers, according to the latest edition of the “Twitter files” revealed Monday.

The coercion campaign during the pandemic began with the Trump administration, but was stepped up under Biden, whose administration was focused on the removal of “anti-vaxxer accounts,” according to Free Press reporter David Zweig.

For example, in June 2021, hours after Biden publicly raged that social media companies were “killing people” for allowing purported vaccine misinformation to propagate, former New York Times reporter and noted vaccine doubter Alex Berenson was banned from the site.

Berenson responded by suing Twitter, forcing the release of internal communications that showed the White House had pressured the company to squash his account.

“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine,” Berenson had tweeted.

“Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS,” he also wrote.

As recently as this month, Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of US Public Policy released a summary of meetings with the White House detailing its alleged pressure campaign, according to Zweig.

Former New York Times reporter and noted vaccine doubter Alex Berenson was banned from Twitter in June of 2021.

Culbertson said in her notes that the administration was “very angry” that Twitter had not taken more aggressive action in silencing vaccine critics and wanted the company to do more, files showed.

Among those whom Twitter did clamp down on was Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School

Kulldorff had tweeted in March 2021 that both children and adults who had been previously infected with COVID did not need the vaccine. That was flagged by the site as “misleading” — even though it was in line with the vaccine policies of “numerous other countries,” Zweig wrote.

That incident was just the icing on the cake, according to the journalist, who uncovered “countless instances of tweets labeled as ‘misleading’ or taken down entirely, sometimes triggering account suspensions, simply because they veered from CDC guidance or differed from establishment views.”

The latest revelations came after previous “Twitter Files” found the FBI and CIA had meddled in the company, and prompted it to bow to political pressure, including convincing Twitter to censor The Post’s exposé on how Hunter Biden used his father’s name to secure questionable business arrangements overseas in the weeks before the 2020 election.

This is a developing story



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Biden puts feelings of small group of progressives ahead of American needs

President Biden was “furious” about the situation at the southern border, and was “dropping f-bombs” at the lack of solutions, a new book claims.

Oh spare us.

We imagine whoever leaked this anonymous tidbit to author Chris Whipple for “The Fight of His Life: Inside Joe Biden’s White House” thought he or she was humanizing the president, or demonstrating that he cares.

Instead it proves two things: Biden keeps lying to the American people. And he is too afraid of his own political party to do what is necessary. 

On the first point, the administration keeps claiming the border is under control, and that, as White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre said earlier this month, “the president has done the work to deal with what we’re seeing at the border since day one.” 

But Biden’s private tantrum shows that isn’t true. He understands what a problem it is, both for the country and as a political liability. Besides putting Vice President Harris in charge of the “root causes,” a portfolio she’s ignored, he hasn’t done anything to fix it. Every time Biden waves it away as “not a big deal,” he’s lying.

As for being mad over the “lack of solutions,” give us a break. There are plenty of solutions. The most obvious one is telling asylum seekers at the border that they are not allowed to come in. The law says they must apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter. Biden could make diplomatic deals with Mexico to stop the caravans. If the images on the news were people being turned away, how long before they stopped coming?

But these were all things that the Trump administration did, and Biden knows that left-wing activists control the Democratic Party and hate any sensible immigration plan. On his first day in office, in fact, Biden halted construction on the border wall, stopped deporting illegal immigrants and erased every deterrent we had. 

He was then shocked, apparently, that migrants would rush the open border. According to the book, an adviser said, “It’s like, ‘How would you feel if you were me and these were the solutions you had?’ It’s the weight of the presidency, right?’”

It is the weight of the presidency, but Biden has made his choice. He knows what the solution to the southern border is, he just doesn’t want to implement it. He put the feelings of a group of progressive lawmakers over the needs of the American people. 

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Twitter users react to Zelensky’s speech to Congress

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelesnky’s speech to a joint meeting of Congress received rave reviews on social media, with several users remarking on the wartime leader’s masterful command of the English language. 

“I’ll give him this: He speaks better English than our President. And Our Vice President. And our Speaker of the House,” podcast host Gerry Callahan wrote on Twitter, mocking President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“And [Zelensky] dresses better than the slob Pennsylvanians just sent to the Senate,” Callahan added, taking a cheap shot at Sen.-elect John Fetterman (D-Pa.), one of the New York Times’s “most stylish” people of 2022. 

Kyle Poen, a regional coordinator with Students for Life, echoed Callahan in a Twitter post, noting that the non-native English speaker’s oratory skills surpassed that of the 80-year-old president.  

“One thing is for certain: Zelensky, with English being far from his primary language, is a better speaker than Biden,” Poen observed.

CBS News Colorado reporter Dillon Thomas called the Ukrainian leader’s speech “incredible” and said he did better in a foreign language than some TV talking heads do in their native language.

The Bidens greet Ukrainian President Zelensky upon his arrival at the White House on December 21.
Oliver Contrera/ZUMAPRESS.com

“Incredible to see Volodymyr Zelenskyy give an entire LIVE prime time address to a foreign [country] in a foreign language to him… I know Americans who get paid to speak English on TV every day and still have difficulties,” Thomas tweeted.

CNN global affairs analyst Bianna Golodryga noted that Zelensky’s oration, done “masterfully in English,” likely irritated Russian President Vladimir Putin, who rarely is heard speaking English in public. 

“No doubt this speech, this venue, this bipartisan applause, all get under Putin’s skin. The chef’s kiss? That Zelensky is delivering it masterfully in English,” Golodryga tweeted

Zelensky addresses Congress – 10 months after the start of the Ukraine war.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Zelensky thanked Congress on Wednesday for sending US military aid to Ukraine as it fights off Russian invaders.

“Against all odds and doom and gloom scenarios, Ukraine didn’t fall. Ukraine is alive and kicking,” the 44-year-old leader said after receiving a standing ovation from both chambers of Congress as he walked toward the podium. 



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

El Paso’s migrant state of emergency a taste of what nation faces as Biden shrugs at border crisis

Oscar Leeser, the Democratic mayor of El Paso, has bent over backward not to “embarrass” the head of his party, President Joe Biden. 

As migrants poured across the border, unmetered and unvetted, he quietly grappled with the strain on the city’s resources. He provided the shelter and food the federal government wouldn’t. He struck private deals with Mayor Eric Adams to alleviate the crush, busing some people to New York. 

Even as the City Council begged him to point out what was happening, he refused. He insisted he’d been told by the Biden administration that if he was patient, they would help. This went on for months.

On Saturday, Leeser’s patience finally broke.

He declared a state of emergency, admitting what had been obvious for nearly two years: The border is out of control, and President Biden isn’t doing anything about it.

Actually, it’s even worse than that. Biden actively has punished Democrats like Leeser and Adams, giving them hardly any aid, refusing to acknowledge what’s happening, deflecting any blame. In other words, he gaslighted them. An astounding 53,000 people crossed the border into El Paso in October alone. Asked if he would visit the border, Biden said “there are more important things going on.” 

Adams reached his breaking point a week before Leeser, imploring, “No one has helped us. No one. We have not gotten a dime from anyone. That has to stop. We need help.”

Migrants crossing the Rio Grande river into El Paso from Mexico on December 18, 2022.
James Keivom for New York Post

Leeser: “We have hundreds and hundreds on the street and that’s not the way we treat our people.”

Meanwhile, White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre said on Thursday: “What Americans should know is that the president has done the work to deal with what we’re seeing at the border since day one” — a complete and total lie.

She threw in a few weak jabs at the usual suspects — ex-President Donald Trump, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — which no one is buying. How can Republicans be to blame for a border that Biden has controlled for two years? Biden JUST. DOESN’T. CARE.

In two days the health directive used to turn back some border-crossers, Title 42, will lapse. In El Paso, it’s expected that 6,000 will cross per day, double what it has been. Biden will be in Delaware, reminiscing about the time he invented Christmas and his uncle won the Nobel Peace Prize. And nothing will be done to actually enforce our immigration laws. The taxpayers of El Paso and New York City will shoulder a burden for which no one voted. 

Oscar Leeser has declared a state of emergency for his city. Who will declare one for the nation?

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Just 30% of voters say Biden should run for reelection: poll

Nearly 60% of voters say that President Biden should not run for reelection in 2024, with most citing his age as the reason for their views, according to a new survey. 

The Redfield & Wilton Strategies poll, done for Newsweek and released on Tuesday, found that 58% of voters do not want the 80-year-old commander-in-chief to seek a second term.

Only 30% of eligible voters polled said that Biden should run again in 2024, and 42% said the president’s advanced age was the most significant reason for their answer. 

Other reasons voters cited for not wanting the octogenarian president to run for reelection included concerns with the Biden administration’s economic policies (16%), preferring other potential Democratic candidates (7%), and the results of the midterm elections (1%). 

The poll, conducted on Dec. 5, surveyed 1,500 eligible voters, 12% of whom were unsure whether they thought Biden should launch a reelection campaign. 

Biden, who is the oldest serving US president in history, has said he expects to run for another four year term but has pushed a final decision back until early next year.

He would be 86 years old when he leaves office if he completes a full second term. 

Biden has reportedly “vented to allies” about how much his age is discussed in the media as he weighs a 2024 run, Politico reported Tuesday.\

“You think I don’t know how f—ing old I am?” an exasperated Biden ranted to one of his acquaintances earlier this year, according to the outlet.

But Biden himself has acknowledged that his age is a “legitimate” issue.

“I think it’s a legitimate thing to be concerned about anyone’s age, including mine,” Biden said during an October interview with MSNBC. “And I think the best way to make the judgment is to watch me. Am I slowing up? Do I have the same pace?” 

In a hypothetical 2024 matchup with former President Donald Trump, the only declared presidential candidate for 2024, Biden beats the 76-year-old Trump 47% to 40%, according to a USA Today/Suffolk University survey released Tuesday.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Prices will ‘take time’ to go down

WASHINGTON — President Biden celebrated a slight decline in the rate of annual inflation to 7.1% Tuesday — while warning a return to normal rates of around 2% was “going to take time” and that there may be “setbacks along the way.”

Biden spoke after new data showed annual price increases cooled in November, continuing a gradual deceleration from a peak of 9.1% in June, while still remaining much higher than at any point since the early 1980s.

“In a world where inflation is rising at double digits in many major economies around the world, inflation is coming down in America,” Biden said at the White House, referring primarily to European inflation, which slightly outpaces US rates due to energy disruption from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“Make no mistake, prices are still too high and we have a lot more work to do,” the president said. “But things are getting better and headed in the right direction.”

“Most Americans can see the progress driving down the street and finding relief at the pump as gas prices fall,” he went on. “Today’s report contains another piece of good news: food inflation slowed last month, providing much-needed relief for millions of families at the grocery store.”

President Biden celebrated a slight decline in the rate of annual inflation to 7.1% on Dec. 13.
AP

Over the past 12 months, US food prices increased 10.6% — with grocery prices going up 12% — while energy prices jumped 13.1%, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

So-called “core inflation,” referring to all items except food and energy, increased by 6% over November of 2021.

In response to a reporter’s shouted question about when prices would “get back to normal,” Biden suggested it might happen toward the end of 2023.

“I hope by the end of next year we’re much closer,” he said. “But I can’t make that prediction. I just — I’m convinced they’re not going to go up. I’m convinced they’re going to continue to go down.”

The Federal Reserve’s target for annual inflation is 2% and for the past two decades, it has been roughly that. The central bank has dramatically increased interest rates in an attempt to lower inflation, heightening concern about a possible recession next year.

The White House has largely blamed inflation on COVID-19, alleged corporate price-gouging, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — while Biden’s critics point to massive increases in government spending since he took office in January 2021.

“I want to be clear: it’s going to take time to get inflation back to normal levels as we make the transition to a more stable and steady growth,” Biden said. “But we could see setbacks along the way as well. We shouldn’t take anything for granted. But what is clear is that my economic plan is working and we’re just getting started.”

He added: “I know it’s been a rough few years for hardworking Americans and for small businesses as well, and that for a lot of folks things are still pretty rough. But there are bright spots all across America where we’re beginning to see the impact of our economic strategy and we’re just getting started.”

Biden has signed some of the largest spending bills in US history, arguing that they were needed to keep the economy afloat and ultimately could reduce some consumer costs, including by improving transportation and energy efficiency.

Last year, Biden signed a $1.9 trillion stimulus bill that passed without Republican support and a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law. This year, he signed the $280 billion bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act, a $437 billion environmental and healthcare spending bill, and a $270 billion veterans healthcare bill.

Although some of the spending bills contained new revenue to offset spending, skeptics accused bill authors of budget gimmicks to paint a rosier economic picture by spreading spending out over fewer years than those offsets.

Republicans will retake the House next month and are vowing to halt ambitious Biden proposals. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), chairwoman of the House Republican Conference, told The Post in a recent interview that the GOP would seek to “claw back this reckless spending” to reduce inflation.

“The first way we start to strengthen the economy is to rein in inflation by stopping the reckless spending bills,” Stefanik said. “We absolutely will use that power … to not only claw back this reckless spending but also put a stop to Joe Biden’s spending proposals … and that will begin to lower the rate of inflation.”

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

The left throws a tantrum as Elon Musk reverses censorship on Twitter

News that Elon Musk brought his 2-year-old son — one of 10 children — into key meetings at Twitter headquarters, after taking over the social media company in the fall, might make it less of a mystery to lefties why his “Priority #1” has been to banish child sexual exploitation material. 

Not that you need to be a parent to abhor child pornography, but for some reason the vile content effectively was given a free pass at Twitter before Musk arrived, so clearly not everyone in the company respected society’s last taboo. 

But, instead of applauding Twitter’s dedication to child safety and attack on degeneracy, leftist media has been decrying Musk’s attempts to restore free speech protections as if they are a threat to civilization. 

They are hopping mad that Musk is demolishing the left-wing censorship regime that saw a sitting president de-platformed, satirical site The Babylon Bee banned and the oldest newspaper in the country locked out of its account for two weeks before the 2020 election. 

Censorship hypocrisy 

Lamenting the explosion of free speech under Musk, Yoel Roth, the former head of “Trust and Safety” who was responsible for censoring The Post, delivered an implied threat to his former employer in an op-ed piece in The New York Times. 

Keep the censorship regime in place or Twitter will be thrown off Google and Apple’s app marketplace, he wrote, “making it more difficult for potential billions of users to obtain Twitter services. This gives Apple and Google enormous power to shape the decisions Twitter makes.” 

Roth claims he just wants to prevent “hate speech,” but why was it that everyone banned by Twitter was conservative? 

Former Twitter executive Yoel Roth claimed Twitter will be removed from Apple and Google’s app stores without censorship.

“Correct,” Musk replied to a tweet observing: “We don’t hear much about Democrats and leftists being let back on Twitter [because] they were never kicked off in the first place . . . Censorship has been deployed as a one-way operation against conservatives.” 

Musk already has reinstated Trump, The Babylon Bee, Project Veritas, psychologist Jordan Peterson, Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and the Libs of TikTok account that merely reposts absurd leftist clips from the video-sharing app TikTok. 

In response you would think Musk had launched the apocalypse. 

Dozens of top Twitter advertisers boycotted the platform in protest, reportedly including Merck, Pfizer, Kellogg, Verizon, General Mills, Musk’s Tesla competitor Volkswagen, General Motors and, ironically, Balenciaga. 

No sooner had the multinational fashion brand signaled its virtue, than Balenciaga had to delete its Twitter account after being bombarded with irate messages over its depraved advertising campaign featuring small children holding teddy bears in bondage gear

Other not-so-subtle pedophilia messages were embedded in the images, such as a sheaf of papers on a table which, on closer inspection, were court documents about child pornography. 

How do you explain that? You launch a $25 million lawsuit against the production company and pretend no Balenciaga executive signed off on the images. 

No wonder Balenciaga protested against a child-porn-free Twitter. 

Which raises the question a a lot of people on Twitter have been asking of Roth, the former head of “Trust and Safety”, after he, too, quit the company in protest. 

Why was child porn permitted on Roth’s watch for years and all but eliminated by Musk in a few days? It’s an important question, but the rest of the media is more interested in amplifying his threats against Twitter. 

The Associated Press tweeted a story claiming “online safety experts predict [Musk reinstating conservatives] will spur a rise in harassment, hate speech and misinformation”, yet did not quote a single expert and did not carry a byline. 

You would think AP might have been more careful about spreading unfounded nonsense after nearly starting World War III the previous week with a false report that Russian missiles had hit Poland. 

The Washington Post’s infamous “technology” reporter Taylor Lorenz penned a piece last week claiming that Musk was “opening the gates of hell . . . to the alarm of activists and online trust and safety experts.” 

At least she quoted some humans, even though they were far left hysterics and trans activist Alejandra Caraballo, who tweets obsessively as @esqueer to get conservatives kicked off Twitter and demand that the Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe should “never know peace again.” 

Musk said his goal is to make Twitter a “forum for the peaceful exchange of views.”
Baron Capital via AP

Right on cue, Antifa accounts which previously were free to dox conservatives and organize violent riots, called for arson attacks on Tesla locations in response to being banned from Twitter. 

All the anti-Twitter “experts” agreed that the ultimate control of Musk will be for Apple and Apple and Google to remove Twitter’s app. 

Musk’s response was to declare he will just “make an alternative phone.” 

He is no right-winger. A libertarian who says he voted for Joe Biden at the last election, he responded to criticism by tweeting: “As a reminder, I was a significant supporter of the Obama-Biden presidency and (reluctantly) voted for Biden over Trump. 

“But freedom of speech is the bedrock of a strong democracy and must take precedence. 

“My preference for the 2024 presidency is someone sensible and centrist. I had hoped that would the case for the Biden administration but have been disappointed so far.” 

His goal is “a trusted digital town square, where a wide range of views are tolerated, provided people don’t break the law or spam. For example, any incitement to violence will result in account suspension . . . 

“Twitter will be a forum for the peaceful exchange of views.” 

In fact, since Musk took over and fired half the workforce, including most of the censorship — err, “moderation” — team, he has published stats indicating there are more users and less hate speech. 

‘Mistake’ to delete Don 

Musk also said banning Trump was a “grave mistake” since there had been “no violation of the law or terms of service. Deplatforming a sitting President undermined public trust in Twitter for half of America.” 

He gets it, but is now bracing for the mother of all attacks, because he is removing the censorship that has been a source of the left’s newfound power in recent years. 

“They won’t give up controlling the narrative easily,” he tweeted over the weekend. 

President Biden hinted at a future investigation into Elon Musk and his “cooperation and/or technical relationships with other countries.”
Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

Remember Biden’s triumphal first press conference after the midterms? He issued a pointed warning to Musk that his administration would be investigating him. 

“I think that Elon Musk’s cooperation and/or technical relationships with other countries is worthy of being looked at whether or not he is doing anything inappropriate,” Biden said when asked by a useful reporter if the new Twitter owner is a national security threat. 

Putting aside the fact that the comment rather lacked self-awareness from someone about to be investigated by Congress over the inappropriateness of millions of dollars given to his son and brother by China and “other countries” which “paid to play” when he was vice president, it was an odd priority for the president’s first pronouncement after losing the House. 

Musk in return has promised he will make public all the details around The Post’s censorship by Twitter over the Hunter Biden laptop story. 

“This is necessary to restore public trust,” he tweeted last week

Amen and Godspeed.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Biden tells boy to ‘go steal a pumpkin’ during ‘boring’ speech

President Biden on Monday told a boy that he could “go steal a pumpkin” to avoid his “boring” speech about Thanksgiving to Marine Corps members in North Carolina.

Biden, 80, made the surprising stab at humor when he approached the eldest of four children whose Marine Corps mother had just introduced the president.

The well-behaved boy had been minding two of his three younger siblings as his mother spoke and his father held the family’s squirming infant.

“This has to be boring, boring, boring for these kids who are standing up here,” Biden said, grasping the boy’s shoulder. “You’re allowed to do anything you want to do, including go steal a pumpkin if you want — anything you want to do.”

The boy chose instead to listen politely to the president.

There were pumpkins decorating the Marine Corps Air Station in Cherry Point, NC, and Biden’s attempts at humor continued — on the heels of his morning turkey pardon — as he told the troops that “the reason we came is the chef’s not bad.”

Biden more seriously recounted to the soldiers his family’s experience with his late son Beau Biden working overseas in the military and praised the families of troops who have to endure their absence.

President Biden speaking at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point in Havelock, North Carolina during a Thanksgiving dinner with military members and their families on November 21, 2022.
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

“Thank you, thank you, thank you for all you’ve done. By the way, I’m serving mashed potatoes so come to my place,” Biden said.

After wrapping up, the president snapped a cellphone selfie with the family and whispered something into the baby’s ear — before donning an apron and scooping mashed potatoes as first lady Jill Biden handled stuffing for an assembly-line buffet.

The president was then swiftly handed a bowl of what appeared to be ice cream before he and the first lady greeted troops, including sitting for conversation and posing for photos.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version