Special counsel zeroes in on Trump’s false election claims: report

The special counsel investigating former President Donald Trump’s role in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot is concentrating on whether he and his associates ripped off donors by boosting incorrect allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 election, according to a report. 

Jack Smith’s office has sent out a slew of subpoenas since the beginning of March to a number of Trump’s advisers, campaign aides, Republican political operatives and consultants involved in the 76-year-old’s failed re-election campaign, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

Along with seeking fundraising documents, a number of former Trump aides have testified to a Washington grand jury, including former senior White House adviser Stephen Miller and former acting deputy secretary of Homeland Security Ken Cuccinelli, the newspaper said. 

The fundraising part of Smith’s investigation is scrutinizing money raised between Nov. 3, 2020, and Jan. 20, 2021, when Trump left the White House, to determine whether the campaign violated wire fraud laws that make it illegal to send false claims via email with the intent to defraud people. 

The subpoenas targeted communications that will allow investigators to compare what Trump aides were telling each other about the veracity of the election and what they were repeating in the fundraising appeals to conservative donors.


Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Waco, Texas, on March 25.
AFP via Getty Images

The newspaper pointed out that a report from the House select committee investigating the Capitol riot concluded that the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee’s fundraising operation raked in $250 million between the November election and Jan. 6 and that up to 25 emails a day were sent to supporters during that time.

The fundraising appeals claimed the election was “rigged” and that Democrats had tried to steal the presidency from Trump. 

A federal judge in March shot down Trump’s claim of executive privilege, clearing the way for more former Trump aides, like one-time White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, to testify before the grand jury. 


Special counsel Jack Smith is investigating whether Donald Trump's aides and associates raised money after the 2020 election by promoting false claims of voter fraud.
Special counsel Jack Smith is investigating whether Donald Trump’s aides and associates raised money after the 2020 election by promoting false claims of voter fraud.
AP

Apart from the Capitol riot, Smith is also investigating the handling of classified documents found at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Florida resort and whether the 45th president obstructed justice in that case. 

That probe is said to be further along than the investigation into Jan. 6, the report said. 

Trump also faces a 34-count felony indictment in Manhattan over a hush-money payment before the 2016 election to porn star Stormy Daniels and a grand jury investigation in Georgia over his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the Peach State.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Team Biden’s charging 1,000 more with Jan. 6 crimes to perpetuate fake political emergency

The Biden administration is planning to charge another thousand Trump supporters with crimes related to the Jan. 6 Capitol clash.

This will perpetuate an atmosphere of political emergency that justifies President Joe Biden’s war on domestic extremism.

But a change in federal judges has turned the Jan. 6 trials into a kangaroo court and makes a mockery of sending nonviolent Trump supporters to prison for threatening American democracy.

More than a thousand people have already been charged with Jan. 6 offenses.

That is equal to almost half of the total number of protesters who entered the Capitol that day.

A corrupt numbers game is at the heart of the Biden propaganda-prosecution campaign.

The more people indicted for Jan. 6, the easier it becomes for the Biden reelection campaign to portray the president as the savior against right-wing tyranny.


Over 1,000 people have already been charged with Jan. 6 offenses.
AFP via Getty Images

Jan. 6 is also Biden’s primary proof America is in grave danger from white supremacy.

The Biden White House has already exploited the Capitol clash to sanctify federal censorship.

Biden White House Digital Director Robert Flaherty invoked Jan. 6 to browbeat Facebook into increasing its suppression of true criticisms of COVID policies and vaccines.

Most of the Jan. 6 protesters who violently attacked police or wantonly destroyed public property have already been justifiably charged by the feds.

But Biden prosecutors are ruining people’s lives for “parading without a permit” near the Capitol that day.

With another thousand cases in the works, will they vilify anyone who allegedly had seditious thoughts within a mile of the Capitol?

Pro-Trump groups had official permits to protest Jan. 6 near the Capitol.

Video from that day shows police and perhaps undercover agents or informants dismantling barriers that blocked protesters from entering prohibited areas.

The full role of undercover federal agents or operatives on Jan. 6 remains secret.

Regardless, collective guilt was speedily attached to all protesters.


January 6th protesters who violently attacked police or destroyed public property have already been charged.
AP

Capitol Police Acting Chief Yogananda Pittman told Congress that Jan. 6 involved “a terrorist attack by tens of thousands of insurrectionists.”

Pittman’s statement sounded deranged in 2021 but has since morphed into Team Biden conventional wisdom.

The FBI classifies all Jan. 6 defendants as “domestic terrorists” — even though only a small percentage of the Trump protesters engaged in violence that day, and most have only been convicted on misdemeanor charges.

FBI whistleblowers reveal that FBI bosses “have pressured agents to move cases into the [domestic violence and extremism] category to hit self-created performance metrics,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) recounted.

FBI Special Agent Garret O’Boyle said that “the FBI made him divide one domestic terrorism case into ‘four different cases,’” Fox News reported, “to show Congress an influx of domestic-terrorism cases.”

If the Jan. 6 court cases were heard by juries of the defendants’ peers, federal prosecutors would likely be striking out far and wide.

Instead, all the cases are being heard in Washington with juries stocked with government employees who believe everything they hear on NPR.

At least one judge is blocking Jan. 6 defendants from access to Capitol security footage Tucker Carlson already aired recently.


One judge has already decided to block Jan. 6 defendants from access to Capitol security footage that recently aired on “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”
Fox News

As of Friday, the new chief judge for the DC federal circuit overseeing all Jan. 6 prosecutions is James Boasberg.

Boasberg was the guardian angel for a corrupt FBI official whose actions helped open the floodgates to political chaos and pervasive distrust.

Former FBI Assistant General Counsel Kevin Clinesmith confessed in 2020 to falsifying key evidence to get a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to spy on the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.

That investigation spurred a torrent of leaks of classified information by the FBI (including by chief James Comey) and the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller.

His investigation roiled national politics for two years before Mueller admitted there was no evidence to prosecute Trump or his campaign officials for colluding with Russia in the 2016 campaign.

Federal prosecutors wanted the disgraced FBI lawyer sent to prison because his crime’s “resulting harm is immeasurable.”

But Boasberg gushed with sympathy for the confessed criminal: “Mr. Clinesmith has lost his job in government service — what has given his life much of its meaning.” Boasberg gave Clinesmith a wrist slap — 400 hours of community service and 12 months of probation.

The Justice Department inspector general documented many abuses of power and deceit by FBI officials in the Trump investigation, but not a single FBI official has spent a day behind bars.

Does Boasberg believe federal agents have a right to subvert our democracy?

Videos Tucker Carlson released show legions of protestors walking peacefully through the Capitol Jan. 6.

How can federal prosecutors hound citizens who committed no violence after the chief federal judge practically absolved the FBI official whose crime helped open a political Pandora’s box?

We still don’t know all that happened inside the Capitol Jan. 6, and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy promises to “slowly roll out” the 40,000 hours of surveillance footage to every news agency.

But Team Biden’s plan to sacrifice another thousand Americans on the Jan. 6 altar is a travesty of justice and due process.

James Bovard is the author of 10 books and a member of the USA Today Board of Contributors.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Princeton student Larry Fife Giberson charged for role in Jan. 6 Capitol riot

A Princeton University student was arrested Tuesday for allegedly engaging in a “violent assault” against police officers outside the US Capitol Building during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot.

Ivy Leaguer Larry Fife Giberson was seen on footage near the front of a mob of law breakers trying to push their way inside the federal building, according to the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

Giberson cheered as Capitol police were pepper sprayed and screamed “drag them out!” at least three times at a tunnel leading to the building, federal prosecutors said.

The 21-year-old from Manahawkin, New Jersey, was taken into custody more than two years after the riot after images of him caught on tape at the Capitol matched photos found on Instagram and the elite school’s website, an FBI agent’s affidavit states.

Giberson and others got into an ugly confrontation with cops guarding the Lower West Terrace tunnel entrance as they attempted to force their way into the building by coordinating a “heave-ho” shove against the police line, the feds said.


A New Jersey man has been arrested on felony and misdemeanor charges for his actions during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
United States Department of Justice

One officer was crushed between a door and shield held by a rioter with Giberson right at the front of the mob, prosecutors alleged.

Shortly after, Giberson then rushed the tunnel entryway and waved for more rioters to join him before returning to the tunnel to take part in another round of coordinated pushing against the police line, the US Attorney’s Office said.

Police officers were eventually able to gain – at least temporarily – control of the tunnel and clear everyone, including Giberson out, prosecutors said.


Larry Fife Giberson was identified as one of many in the crowd on Jan. 6.
United States Department of Justice

But rioters kept battling officers at the access point and Giberson stood nearby and cheered after rioters dragged one officer into the crowd, the feds said. He also watched as other officers were ruthlessly assaulted, according to prosecutors.

At one point, he allegedly tried to start a “drag them out!” chant but no one else joined in.

Gibersion was charged with civil disorder, a felony, and other related misdemeanors.


The images of the suspect were matched with photos found on Princeton’s website, the feds said.
United States Department of Justice

He was in the tunnel for roughly an hour, according to an affidavit.

Giberson is currently enrolled as an undergrad at Princeton, a school spokesperson said.

He sported a “Make America Great Again” hat and wore a Trump flag around his neck at the time of the mob violence that disrupted the joint session of Congress for certifying President Biden’s win over former President Trump, according to the affidavit.


He’s accused of pushing toward a police line of officers guarding an entrance to the Capitol.
United States Department of Justice

It’s unclear if Giberson attended the “Stop the Steal” rally where Trump spoke in the waning days of his presidency.

Giberson was arrested in DC Tuesday and later released by a judge after an initial hearing.

About 1,000 people have been arrested for their role in the Capitol riot so far. 

With Post wires

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Congress dithered while US withered

A line from legendary manager Casey Stengel fits the moment: “Can’t anybody here play this game?” He was talking about his hapless 1962 New York Mets, but the damning question can be fairly directed to both political parties and Washington itself.

In one of the most worrisome signs of our era, the federal government has never been larger, richer and wielded more power over the lives of citizens. The size, debt and reach are astounding when compared to just a generation ago.

Yet that bejeweled behemoth is failing miserably at many of its most basic duties. Public safety, border security, stable prices and quality public education are in decline, leaving many Americans angry about their government and cynical about the people who run it.

With little regard to the party of the president, polls in recent years consistently show only about three in 10 respondents believe the country is on the right track. More damning, a large Pew study last year revealed an enormous trust deficit.

Just two in 10 Americans believe the federal government does what it should, a low point in a decades-long decline. When the question was first asked in 1958, nearly 75% said they trusted the feds to do the right thing all or most of the time.

It is hard to imagine those days ever returning, with events of last week vividly demonstrating that both parties are hellbent on squandering the little goodwill that remains.

House Republicans amped up their bid to make conservatism a punchline as their inability to promptly choose a speaker made history in all the wrong ways.

Tensions rose in the House Chamber when voting seemed to stall.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

What should have been a feel-good, routine process to kick off a new Congress turned into a bloody slog, with Kevin McCarthy needing 15 roll-call votes over four days to eke out a narrow majority.

When the end finally came about 12:30 a.m. Saturday, it felt more like a mercy rule conclusion than a victory, with McCarthy looking like he needs a vacation before starting work.

Wall-to-wall TV coverage captured the stomach-churning ways the sausage was made, with the process showing intraparty pettiness and anger that obscured some substantive disagreements over how power would be shared. Midterm voters who gave the GOP a narrow majority certainly didn’t believe they would get a civil war before a single vote was taken on their behalf.

Democrats made no effort to mask their pleasure, and why should they? They united behind their leader, Brooklyn’s Hakeem Jeffries, in every round of voting, turning GOP squabbling into comic relief.

Welcome WH distraction

President Biden is set to visit the border for the first time in two years on Sunday.
John Moore/Getty Images

Dems also understood that every minute Republicans spent on the shootout in a lifeboat was a minute stolen from any serious probes of the Biden administration. As it turned out, the GOP frittered away a week in an internal struggle that should have been resolved in the two months since the election.

One inadvertent effect is that the self-neutered GOP copied the House habits of the last two years under Dem control. As Republican James Comer of Kentucky said in a fiery Friday afternoon nomination of McCarthy before the 13th ballot, the House never held a single oversight hearing on the millions who illegally crossed the border or the chaotic and deadly withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Nor did it examine the origin of COVID-19 or the Biden family’s foreign business. He pledged to probe all that and more as head of the Oversight panel — as soon as a Speaker was chosen.

The speech drew loud GOP applause, but failed to put McCarthy over the top. So the crucial probes remained on hold.

Although some of the holdouts demanded changes that smack of personal advantages and perks, others had more important concerns. Chief among these was fixing a corrupt budget-making process where leaders of both houses and parties jam virtually all spending into a gigantic bill, with members expected to vote yes without having time to read or debate it.

In his concessions to the holdouts, McCarthy sensibly vowed to end the practice, which is a major cause of the nation’s soaring debt.

Even before we know whether that and other changes will make a meaningful difference, we already know the speaker fights raised fresh doubts the GOP will accomplish anything significant. A four-seat majority doesn’t leave much margin for dissent and the wasted week reinforced the party’s image of being too divided to govern.

Hundreds of residents and activists marched in El Paso, Texas, on Jan. 7 ahead of President Biden’s visit.
Andres Leighton/AP

Meanwhile, the Biden White House proved again that it, too, doesn’t have a clue about good governance as it staged a series of strange events to draw sharp contrasts with the House hijinks.

The president, with Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell in tow, visited Kentucky to tout the bloated bipartisan infrastructure bill, a public relations coup for Biden that earned McConnell barbs from The Wall Street Journal editorial page and other conservatives.

Biden’s border bluster

On Thursday, Biden tried again to impersonate an active president by announcing a plan to deal with Cubans, Nicaraguans, Haitians and Venezuelans who come to the border. Under his order, they must apply for asylum from their home nation or a safe haven and he will admit 30,000 a month on a “parole” program.

As with Biden’s border policies for the last two years, this one is a head-scratcher. Hopefully, legal challenges will scuttle it as an overreach.

Besides, the Border Patrol reports that out of 234,000 November encounters with migrants, about 90,000 were from the four countries Biden cited.

What about the other 144,000 from other countries? And what about the hundreds of thousands of “got aways,” those who cross and disappear without encountering agents? Who knows?

Certainly not Biden, with a highlight of his remarks being another instance of his calling the vice president “President Harris.”

Biden speaks on Jan. 6 during a ceremony to mark the second anniversary of the Capitol riot.
Patrick Semansky/AP

The main point was to show he was doing public business while the GOP was eating its own, a point he will reinforce Sunday when he finally visits the border.

Biden was at it again Friday, too, holding a ceremony on the second anniversary of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. The ostensible purpose was to honor police and others for their conduct that day, but the real purpose was to remind the public about Donald Trump and what Biden calls an “insurrection” carried out by “MAGA Republicans.”

It was a hyper-partisan event, where the president repeated his false claim that defenders “gave their lives” that day. In fact, the only person who died on Jan. 6 was an unarmed protestor shot and killed by a Capitol police officer.

Such distortions highlight a cause of the decline in public trust. When officials of both parties speak in coded ways designed only for core supporters, there is no appeal to people not committed to a partisan camp. The result is the deep and bitter polarization that leaves little space for any American seeking both common sense and common ground.

Unfortunately, Washington offers very little of either these days.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Trump didn’t know White House schedule was public: ex aide

Former President Donald Trump spent nearly four years in the White House before learning his daily schedule was made public — at which point he ordered a stripped down version of the document, a former aide testified.

The surprising revelation was shared by former White House deputy press secretary Judd Deere in his testimony to the House Jan. 6 committee that was made public on Tuesday.

“Every evening we prepared and released the daily guidance for the following day of the president’s public schedule. Beginning sometime around mid to late December, the president discovered that, for the first time, my understanding, that we released a public schedule of his to the public,” Deere told the congressional panel investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. 

“He wanted to change the way we did that,” the former president’s communications aide added. 

Donald Trump spent nearly four years in the White House before learning his daily schedule was made public.
EPA

The White House daily schedule notably changed around Jan. 5, 2021, with details of Trump’s daily comings and goings at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave omitted and replaced with “boilerplate” language saying that the president would have “many calls and have many meetings.” 

“And so what became the new version of the public schedule was basically a couple of sentences about what his day would consist of, rather than specific times and titles of events and an outline form,” Deere explained. 

The guidance drafted by Deere for Jan. 6 and approved by White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany read: “President Trump will work from early in the morning until late in the evening. He will make many calls and have many meetings. The President will depart for the Ellipse at 10:50am to deliver remarks at the Save America Rally.”

The White House daily schedule notably changed around Jan. 5, 2021.
REUTERS

“The first two sentences in this are the standard boilerplate language that we began using every day. And the third sentence is the item that’s specific to the January 5 guidance for January 6,” Deere told the House select committee.

 The House panel investigating the storming of the Capitol and the 76-year-old former president’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election released its final report last week and found that Trump engaged in a criminal “multi-part conspiracy” in an attempt to remain commander-in-chief.

The panel referred four criminal charges to the Department of Justice, accusing Trump of insurrection, conspiracy to defraud the US, and obstruction of an act of Congress.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Kellyanne Conway appears ‘voluntarily’ for interview with Jan. 6 committee

Former top Trump White House adviser Kellyanne Conway met with the House select committee investigating last year’s Capitol riot Monday as the panel prepares its final report on the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

Conway, who served as White House counselor under former President Donald Trump, reportedly was interviewed for five hours and was asked about her conversations with Trump after his 2020 election loss.

Specifically, the committee was interested in reports that Conway told acquaintances the now-76-year-old Trump admitted to her that he knew he had lost his re-election bid fair and square, according to CNN.

The anecdote first appeared in Jonathan Lemire’s recent book “The Big Lie,” in which the Politico reporter writes that the former president wondered “aloud to Kellyanne Conway how he could ‘lose to f—ing Joe Biden.’”

“I’m here voluntarily,” Conway told reporters during a break in her testimony, adding after her interview ended that she did not invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Former top Trump White House adviser Kellyanne Conway met with the House select committee investigating last year’s Capitol riot.
SHAWN THEW/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
Conway served as White House counselor under former President Donald Trump.
SHAWN THEW/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Conway, 55, resigned her White House post at the end of August 2020, more than four months before Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally and the subsequent violence at the Capitol. 

However, the Washington Post reported days after the riot that Conway remained an aide to the former president and urged him to call off his supporters attempting to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory.

When quizzed by reporters Monday, Conway — now a Fox News contributor — said that she is not working on Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, and refused to give any details on conversations she’s had with Trump about the 2020 election.

The House select committee is expected to release its final report on the Jan. 6 riot before the end of the year, detailing the findings of its extensive investigation.

The upcoming report is expected to focus primarily on Trump and his actions leading up to and during the storming of the Capitol. 

The panel is expected to be disbanded early next year, with Republicans regaining a majority in the House. 

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

WaPo’s gas-price oops, the NYT’s pro-Dem agenda and more

Diary of disturbing disinformation and dangerous delusions

This slur:

“Is it as obvious as it seems that domestic violent extremists are an important part of the voting coalition on the right?”

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, Tuesday — the day before a left-wing nut planned to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

We say: Don’t write off Wallace’s reality-free slur as mere bad timing. With the Justice Department labeling parents “domestic terrorists” and the left hyping (and distorting) fringe “white replacement theory” (while ignoring left-wing extremists, antifa, etc.), partisans like Wallace really do see right-wing terrorists around every corner. 


This comparison:

“Watergate was a burglary of Democratic party offices. Nobody died. The violent assault on Capitol Hill ultimately claimed seven lives.” 

— Edward Luce, Financial Times, Wednesday

We say: The truth? Capitol rioters didn’t kill a single person. Not one. Yes, a Trump supporter was fatally shot . . . by a Capitol Police officer. Two protesters died of natural causes, and another OD’d. The next day, Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick also died of natural causes, though for months left-leaning outlets and even President Joe Biden himself claimed protesters killed him. Two other officers later committed suicide. Was the breach of the Capitol an abhorrent stain on the democratic process, involving physical confrontations and terrorizing lawmakers? Absolutely. But isn’t that bad enough? Attempts to milk it for political gain by falsely painting protesters as killers are disgusting in their own right.


Spot the difference:

NY Post composite; istock/ Getty Images

We say: Oops. Back in November 2020, The Washington Post cited experts who pooh-poohed conservatives’ warnings about a then-looming spike in gas prices under President Joe Biden. Looks like the experts, and the WaPo, were a tad . . . off, as a New York Post report Monday shows.


This story:

On Wednesday, The Times made Fox News’ coverage of the Jan.6 hearings front-page news.
NY Post composite; istock/ Getty Images

We say: Since when is a network’s news lineup a front-page story? Fox News said its sister station, Fox Business, would cover the Democrats’ Capitol-riot hearing, while its prime-time hosts would address it “as news warrants.” That wasn’t good enough for the Dems’ “paper of record”: It notes that other (left-leaning) networks will devote “wall-to-wall” coverage to the hearing and tries to shame Fox for not climbing aboard. Yet the mass coverage is part of a partisan show staged by Dems in Congress; networks have every right to decide how they want to cover that. The Times, however, thinks viewers should have no options. Meanwhile, the Gray Lady ran its report on a left-winger’s plot to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on . . . page A20. Is there any doubt about its agenda?


This tweet:

We say: After a man was caught Wednesday outside Justice Kavanaugh’s home plotting to kill him, White House Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates flatly denied that former Press Secretary Jen Psaki encouraged protests near the jurists’ personal residences in response to the leak of a draft opinion on Roe v. Wade. Yet a transcript Bates himself posted shows Psaki clearly saying, “We certainly continue to encourage [protests] outside of judges’ homes, and that’s the president’s position.” Sure, she meant peaceful protests, but directing protesters to officials’ residences invites trouble, as the plan to kill Kavanaugh plainly shows.

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version