EU investigates Meta over Facebook and Instagram child safety | Social Media News

The European Commission says it is concerned systems used by apps could ‘exploit weaknesses and inexperience’ of children and stimulate ‘addictive behaviour’.

European Union regulators have opened a formal investigation into Meta for potential breaches of online content rules relating to child safety in its Facebook and Instagram platforms.

The European Commission said on Thursday it was concerned the algorithmic systems used by the popular social media platforms to recommend videos and posts could “exploit the weaknesses and inexperience” of children and stimulate “addictive behaviour”.

Its investigators will also examine whether these systems are strengthening the so-called “rabbit hole” that leads users to increasingly disturbing content.

“In addition, the Commission is also concerned about age-assurance and verification methods put in place by Meta,” the bloc’s executive arm said in a statement.

The investigation is being conducted under the Digital Services Act (DSA), a law that compels the world’s largest tech firms to enhance their efforts in protecting European users online.

The DSA has strict rules to protect children and ensure their privacy and security online.

Thierry Breton, the EU’s internal market commissioner, said on X the regulators were “not convinced that Meta has done enough to comply with the DSA obligations – to mitigate the risks of negative effects to the physical and mental health of young Europeans on its platforms Facebook and Instagram”.

In a statement, Meta said: “We want young people to have safe, age-appropriate experiences online and have spent a decade developing more than 50 tools and policies designed to protect them.”

The United States-based tech giant added: “This is a challenge the whole industry is facing, and we look forward to sharing details of our work with the European Commission.”

There is no deadline for the investigations to wrap up. Violations could result in fines that could reach as high as six percent of a platform’s global turnover or even a ban for serious and repeat violations.

Facebook and Instagram are among 23 “very large” online platforms that must comply with the DSA. Others include Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube.

The bloc has launched a wave of investigations, including another on Meta last month over fears that Facebook and Instagram were failing to counter disinformation ahead of EU elections in June.

In February, the commission began a probe into TikTok on suspicion that the popular video-sharing app may not be doing enough to address negative effects on young people.

The EU also forced TikTok to suspend its spinoff Lite app’s reward schemes in April after warning its “addictive” nature could risk users’ mental health.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

TikTok owner ByteDance files lawsuit against US law forcing app’s sale | Social Media News

ByteDance, the owner of the social media platform TikTok, has filed a lawsuit against the United States government in an effort to block a law that would force it to divest from its US assets.

On Tuesday, lawyers for ByteDance filed the complaint in the US Court of Appeals in Washington, DC, arguing the law was “obviously unconstitutional”.

President Joe Biden signed the law less than two weeks ago, on April 24, as part of a package that included foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel, as well as humanitarian relief for Gaza.

Under the law, ByteDance has nine months to sell off its US-based operations. Its deadline is January 19, with an additional three-month extension possible should a sale be in progress.

But in its suit, ByteDance argues divestment will not be possible within the timeframe allotted — “not commercially, not technologically, not legally”.

It also argues it is being unfairly targeted by a law that violates the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects free speech.

“For the first time in history, Congress has enacted a law that subjects a single, named speech platform to a permanent, nationwide ban, and bars every American from participating in a unique online community with more than 1 billion people worldwide,” the lawsuit reads.

A TikTok user protests outside the US Congress on April 23, as legislation was passed to force ByteDance to divest from its US operations [Mariam Zuhaib/AP]

While ByteDance maintained it has no plans to sell TikTok, its popular video-sharing app, it said that doing so would not even be feasible under the law.

Millions of lines of code would have to shift hands, the lawsuit explained, and any prospective owners would have to access ByteDance’s algorithms to keep it operational — something that would also be barred under the law.

“There is no question: the Act will force a shutdown of TikTok by January 19, 2025, silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate in ways that cannot be replicated elsewhere,” the lawsuit said.

TikTok has been a target of bipartisan criticism in the US, with politicians concerned about its national security implications.

ByteDance is a Chinese technology company, and its critics fear that the Chinese government could request the information it collects from users, raising privacy concerns.

US Congress members like Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi said the April law is therefore necessary to protect US users.

“This is the only way to address the national security threat posed by ByteDance’s ownership of apps like TikTok,” he said in a statement on Tuesday. “Instead of continuing its deceptive tactics, it’s time for ByteDance to start the divestment process.”

ByteDance has long denied furnishing any information about US users to the Chinese government, and it has publicly pledged not to do so, brushing aside such concerns as “speculative”.

The lawsuit also notes that the company spent $2bn to protect US user data and has made commitments under a 90-page draft “National Security Agreement” with the US government.

TikTok has been in the US government’s crosshairs for nearly four years, as tensions continue between Washington and Beijing.

In 2020, for instance, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order to ban the video platform, citing national security concerns.

But federal judges blocked the ban, saying that officials demonstrated a “failure to consider an obvious and reasonable alternative before banning TikTok”.

States have similarly sought to block the app, most notably Montana. In April 2023, Governor Greg Gianforte signed a first-of-its-kind bill, SB 419, that would fine TikTok for operating within state lines, as well as any app stores that carried it.

But it was unclear how Montana planned to enforce the law, which was quickly challenged in court.

Montana’s SB 419 was scheduled to take effect on January 1, but a federal judge ultimately blocked it, awarding another win to ByteDance. The state’s attorney general has promised an appeal.

Many free-speech advocates predict a similar fate awaits April’s federal law forcing ByteDance to sever itself from its US operations.

Jameel Jaffer, the executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, told the Associated Press that he anticipated ByteDance would prevail in Tuesday’s lawsuit.

“The First Amendment means the government can’t restrict Americans’ access to ideas, information, or media from abroad without a very good reason for it — and no such reason exists here,” Jaffer said in a statement.

For its part, China has taken similar actions against US-based companies like Meta, whose WhatsApp and Threads platforms were recently ordered to be removed from Chinese-based app stores over questions of national security.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

On ‘China’s Instagram’, women find a space to discuss the routine and taboo | Social Media

Taipei, Taiwan – Alice Guo sparked a flurry of interest on Xiaohongshu, the Chinese social media and e-commerce platform, when she decided one day in 2021 to share advice on preparing for a job interview.

Chinese-born Guo was living in Toronto at the time, grounded by the COVID-19 pandemic after years of bouncing between jobs in Vancouver, Hong Kong, New York, Los Angeles and Shanghai.

“I started to do a few posts and one day, I just posted about the interview process that got me into a venture capital firm,” Guo, who is in her early 30s, told Al Jazeera.

“I woke up the next day, just all of a sudden, it went from maybe like 20 followers to 500 followers overnight.”

Before long, Guo’s page, called “Ali is Working Hard” in Chinese, built up an audience of about 45,000 followers, drawn by a mix of professional advice and updates on her daily life in Canada.

Guo’s page is among the countless accounts on Xiaohongshu that have tapped into a user base primarily made up of young, highly-educated women, both in major Chinese cities and in emigrant communities overseas.

Though lacking the global name recognition of Facebook, Instagram or X, Xiaohongshu has become the go-to platform for Millennial and Gen-Z Chinese women since its launch in 2013 – as just a set of humble PDF documents offering travel advice.

The platform, which has been described as China’s answer to Instagram, had 200 million monthly active users in 2022, according to self-reported data, about 70 percent of whom were women.

About 70 percent of Xiaohongshu’s users are women [Aly Song/Reuters]

While Xiaohongshu translates as “Little Red Book” in English – the same name as Mao Zedong’s famous text – the platform shares little else in common with the Chinese leader’s collection of speeches and writings.

Rather than promoting revolutionary values, the platform, which combines blog posts and short videos, exemplifies China’s post-Communist consumerist culture, which is aspirational, ambitious and globally minded.

And for women in a society where political dissent is tightly controlled and socially conservative attitudes hold sway, Xiaohongshu has become something of a sanctuary for like-minded peers to freely discuss topics of common concern.

Users share content on an expansive range of issues, from relatively uncontentious topics like work life and fashion, to semi-taboo – albeit not overtly political – topics like divorce, domestic violence, and perceptions that women who have not gotten married and had children by their early 30s are failures or undesirable.

“Those are all stereotypes, but it’s there. It’s real and it creates anxiety,” Daniela, a Xiaohongshu user who asked to be only referred to by her first name, told Al Jazeera.

“And, of course, a lot of really talented women with amazing backgrounds are facing really big career challenges,” added Daniela, who posts content related to women’s career advancement and empowerment to her more than 125,000 followers.

Despite Beijing’s heavy censorship of the Internet, discussions on contentious issues are often allowed on Xiaohongshu, especially if they focus on personal experiences rather than greater systemic issues in Chinese society.

Still, there are red lines.

One Xiaohongshu user, who asked to not be named, told Al Jazeera that posts she made about her experience of freezing her eggs were deleted, even though the Chinese government is pushing women to have more children.

Discussions about fertility treatments have been censored on Xiaohongshu even as the Chinese government is trying to encourage women to have more babies [China Photos/Getty Images]

The platform has also cracked down on some displays of conspicuous consumption, warning users to be more “empathetic” and not flaunt their wealth as it is “still out of reach for a large proportion of people”.

Users have similarly been discouraged from over-editing their photos and videos.

Part of Xiaohongshu’s appeal is that it embodies a polished, or “jinzhi,” feminine aesthetic that requires “not only money, but also cultural and educational capital” to attain, setting it apart from more male-dominated platforms like WeChat and Weibo, according to Jia Guo, a professor in gender and cultural studies at the University of Sydney.

“Jinzhi has always been a big part of Xiaohongshu,” Guo told Al Jazeera. “What is behind this jinzhi lifestyle is classed consumer culture in post-socialist China and classed distinction of taste. Not only money, but also cultural and educational capital is needed to be jinzhi. Such a middle-class urban lifestyle is popular on Xiaohongshu and it is highly gendered too – often presented by young women.”

Since it was founded more than a decade ago, Xiaohongshu has also become adroit at understanding its users, thanks to its “game changer” algorithm, said Sheng Zou, an assistant professor at Hong Kong Baptist University who researches the digital economy.

Zou said that Xiaohongshu users often cite the algorithm as being part of its allure.

“Most would agree that the algorithm is precise and effective in detecting and/or predicting their content preferences or aspects of their identity, more so than some other popular apps that they are using,” Zou told Al Jazeera.

“You can go really deep into different communities,” James Hsu, a Taiwanese-Canadian based in China who uses Xiaohongshu to promote coaching and consulting services, told Al Jazeera, explaining how a “lot of influencers actually set up group chats that you can just join by going to their profile page”.

“It feels more like an actual resource than just like pure entertainment, because you could definitely go in there to learn things like hard skills, or soft skills, like how to start a business, like how to interview for a job, and there are many, many cross-sections with that,” Hsu said.

Profit problems

Despite its loyal and growing following, Xiaohongshu has struggled until recently to make money.

In its early days, Xiaohonghsu had a strong e-commerce component, where Chinese consumers could source reliable foreign products – a boon in a country rife with fake goods and knockoffs.

The platform gradually shifted over the years towards lifestyle and educational content, and more recently, with the rise of short-form video, livestream shopping and influencer brand deals.

Olivia Plotnick, the founder of the Shanghai-based marketing agency Wai Social, said that Xiaohongshu appears to have found its niche with such deals.

“They’ve had a lot of problems trying to monetize for the past several years, and I think they’ve potentially found a good way to do it with livestreaming recently,” Plotnick told Al Jazeera.

These deals do not come cheap, as Chinese influencers can charge between three and five more times than their Western counterparts, Plotnick said.

An influencer with 10,000 followers can command $300 to $500 per post, while an influencer with upwards of 300,000 followers can command $5,000, she said.

Plotnick said such partnerships are attractive for brands as Xiaohongshu has always been strong at raising brand awareness, even if its e-commerce component lags behind retail giants like Taobao and Tmall.

Meanwhile, the platform stands apart from competitors thanks to a livestreaming style that provides a “quiet luxury” feel, she said.

The approach appears to be paying off.

Alibaba is among the major investors in Xiaohongshu [Aly Song/Reuters]

Xiaohongshu, whose top investors include Alibaba, Tencent and United States-based GGV Capital, made its first profit last year, taking in $500m on revenues of $3.7bn, the Financial Times reported in March, citing people briefed on the matter.

Xiaohongshu did not reply to a request for comment.

As it seeks to shore up its financial position, Xiaohongshu has also been trying to diversify its user base.

Despite boasting some 200 million users, its customer base is still small in comparison with platforms such as Weibo, Douyin and WeChat, which claim between 600 million and 1.2 billion-plus users.

Xiaohongshu’s drive to grow its user base includes outreach efforts to men and those living outside of China’s “tier one” and “tier two” cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai.

Xiaohongshu is also gaining traction outside mainland China, including in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Western cities with large Chinese diaspora populations, such as Toronto, where Alice Guo of “Ali is Working Hard” is based.

Guo said one-third of her audience comes from North America and she is an avid consumer of diaspora-created content herself.

“It’s like my Yelp, it’s like my Google. So if I want to find where to eat, what to eat, I look for it on Xiaohongshu. Especially in Toronto, there are tonnes of Chinese, so almost every single restaurant has a good review, and I can find some content on it,” Guo said.

“If I want to read a book and know how good it is, I go to Xiaohongshu for it. And then if I want to know about makeup, I go to Xiaohongshu.”

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

US TikTok’s future in jeopardy as Biden signs ban bill: What’s next? | Explainer News

The US Senate has overwhelmingly approved a bill that would ban TikTok unless its Chinese owner, ByteDance, divests from the video-sharing app in nine months amid concerns that the company poses a national security threat.

TikTok has denied the Chinese government could access users’ data and has dubbed the bill, which was passed by a 79-18 vote, as unconstitutional. The bill was attached to a measure to provide a $95bn emergency aid package for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

President Joe Biden has said he will sign it into law on Wednesday.

What do we know about the TikTok ban, and what happens next?

Why the ban on TikTok? How will it impact TikTok?

ByteDance bought the popular karaoke app Musical.ly and relaunched it as TikTok in 2017. It is one of the fastest-growing apps in the US, and has 150 monthly subscribers, more than half of them ages 18-34. In 2023, the platform boasted more than one billion monthly active users globally and a revenue of $120bn, of which $16bn comes from the US.

The app’s growing influence has drawn the attention of spy agencies and US lawmakers who have expressed fear that TikTok might share users’ data with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), a claim the company has denied. The data, some say, could also be used by China to spread misinformation that could harm the democratic process.

“For years, we’ve allowed the Chinese Communist Party to control one of the most popular apps in America. That was dangerously shortsighted,” said Senator Marco Rubio, the top Republican on the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. “A new law is going to require its Chinese owner to sell the app. This is a good move for America.”

In December 2022, the US Congress banned the use of the app on any federally issued device or network. Several other countries have followed suit, imposing curbs on the use of TikTok in government offices. India banned the app in 2020, when there were 200 million subscribers in the wake of border skirmishes.

The widely popular app has also been accused of pushing pro-Palestine content – a claim the company has denied. TikTok’s young users (ages 16-24) in the US, who form 60 percent of its total users, sympathise with Palestine, the company said last November.

TikTok’s executives have been grilled during multiple congressional hearings. In March of last year, the company’s Chief Executive Shou Zi Chew assured lawmakers that TikTok had taken steps to safeguard user data.

The company has also invested $1.5bn to store TikTok in the US, and Oracle, a US-based multinational corporation, would provide the cloud and storage services for the project. It has also taken measures to separate its US operations from its Chinese parent company.

China’s Foreign Ministry has said that the US allegations were not backed by evidence and the ban would undermine fair competition. Several Chinese tech firms have been blacklisted by the US amid a war over the internet and technology between Washington and Beijing.

Last week, Apple said Beijing had ordered it to remove Meta Platforms’ WhatsApp and Threads from its App Store in China over Chinese national security concerns.

If ByteDance refuses to divest the company, the app would lose access to app stores, web hosting and network providers.

Until the nine-month deadline, TikTok will remain active in the US. The US president can grant an extension of the deadline for 90 more days if the company is seen as progressing on the terms set in the law.

What can TikTok do now?

While TikTok is able to operate in the US, for now, the company executives and attorneys will have to fight on legal grounds.

“This unconstitutional law is a TikTok ban, and we will challenge it in court. We believe the facts and the law are clearly on our side, and we will ultimately prevail. The fact is, we have invested billions of dollars to keep US data safe and our platform free from outside influence and manipulation,” TikTok said in a statement on Wednesday.

TikTok is set to challenge the bill on First Amendment grounds and TikTok users are also expected to again take legal action. A US judge in Montana in November blocked a state ban on TikTok, citing free speech grounds. The US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech under the First Amendment.

The American Civil Liberties Union said banning or requiring divestiture of TikTok would “set an alarming global precedent for excessive government control over social media platforms … If the United States now bans a foreign-owned platform, that will invite copycat measures by other countries.”

Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat, said he was concerned the bill “provides broad authority that could be abused by a future administration to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights”.

In 2020, former US President Donald Trump attempted to legislate his own TikTok ban, but he has somewhat done a reversal on banning the popular social media app while campaigning for another term in office. On Monday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform: “Just so everyone knows, especially the young people, Crooked Joe Biden is responsible for banning TikTok.”



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

US Senate passes bill to force sale of TikTok, sending it to Biden | Technology

TikTok has said legislation ‘would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans’.

The United States Senate has approved legislation that would ban the popular video-sharing app TikTok unless it divests from its Chinese parent company.

The vote on Tuesday clears the way for the bill to be signed into law by President Joe Biden, who has backed the measures, although the legislation is expected to be challenged in the courts.

The proposal, which would give Chinese company ByteDance nine months to sell the platform, was included in a larger $95bn package that provides foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel.

The Senate voted 79-18 to approve the package, after Republicans in the House of Representatives last week attached the TikTok bill to the foreign aid proposals to help expedite its passage through Congress.

The House passed the package on Saturday in a 360-58 bipartisan vote.

Both Republicans and Democrats have claimed that TikTok threatens national security, arguing the platform could be used by Beijing to spy on Americans and manipulate public debate.

TikTok has insisted it has not shared American users’ data with the Chinese government and that it never would.

In a statement on Sunday, TikTok said the bill to force its sales “would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans”.

TikTok is expected to seek a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of the law pending a challenge to its constitutionality.

Last year, a judge in the US state of Montana blocked a similar ban after finding it “oversteps state power” and “likely violates the First Amendment”.

Civil liberties organisations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, have also opposed the proposals on free speech grounds.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

‘Arrogant billionaire’: Australia, Musk in war of words over censorship | Social Media

Elon Musk and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese clash over order to remove X posts on church stabbing.

Australia and Elon Musk have escalated their war of words over censorship after an Australian court ordered social media platform X to remove footage of a church stabbing.

An Australian judge on Monday ruled that X must block users worldwide from accessing videos of a knife attack on an Assyrian Christian bishop in Sydney after the country’s internet watchdog sought an injunction.

The Federal Court in Sydney granted the temporary global ban after X had said it would challenge eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant’s notice to remove posts related to last week’s attack on Mar Mari Emmanuel.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Tuesday that the government was prepared to take on Musk, whom he labelled an “arrogant billionaire who thinks he’s above the law, but also above common decency”.

“What the eSafety Commissioner is doing is doing her job to protect the interests of Australians, and the idea that someone would go to court for the right to put up violent content on a platform shows how out-of-touch Mr Musk is. Social media needs to have social responsibility with it. Mr Musk is not showing any,” Albanese told public broadcaster ABC.

Albanese had earlier said it was “extraordinary” that X had decided to challenge the eSafety commissioner’s notice and denied the issue was a matter of freedom of speech.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese  has criticised Elon Musk for challenging a takedown notice issued by the country’s internet watchdog [Izhar Khan/AFP]

Musk, who bought the platform formally known as Twitter in 2022, on Tuesday indicated that he would fight the court order.

“Our concern is that if ANY country is allowed to censor content for ALL countries, which is what the Australian ‘eSafety Commissar’ is demanding, then what is to stop any country from controlling the entire Internet?” Musk said on X.

“We have already censored the content in question for Australia, pending legal appeal, and it is stored only on servers in the USA.”

Musk earlier posted a meme depicting X as being pro-free speech and other social media platforms supporting censorship and propaganda, with the caption: “Don’t take my word for it, just ask the Australian PM!”

Australia’s government has blamed social media posts related to the attack on Emmanuel for inflaming community tensions in multicultural Sydney.

Under its Online Safety Act passed in 2021, Australia has been at the forefront of efforts to hold tech companies responsible for the content posted on their platforms.

Emmanuel, a prominent conservative leader of the Assyrian Christ The Good Shepherd Church in Wakeley in western Sydney, suffered lacerations to his head when he was attacked last Monday during a mass service that was being broadcast online.

More than 50 police officers were injured and 20 police cars damaged in an ensuing riot outside the church.

Emmanuel, who survived the attack, released a message last week saying he was “doing fine, recovering very quickly” and that he had forgiven his attacker.

Police on Friday charged a 16-year-old with terrorism offences in connection with the stabbing.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

EU threatens to suspend TikTok Lite app’s rewards feature | Social Media News

European Commission says the app has ‘risks of serious damage for the mental health of users’, including minors.

The European Union has launched a probe into TikTok’s spinoff Lite app and threatened to suspend an “addictive” feature on it that rewards users for watching and liking videos, amid child-safety concerns.

TikTok Lite arrived in France and Spain in March allowing users aged 18 and more to earn points that can be exchanged for goods like vouchers or gift cards through the app’s rewards programme.

The European Commission said in a statement on Monday that it has concerns about the app’s “risks of serious damage for the mental health of users”, including minors.

TikTok Lite is a smaller version of the popular TikTok app, taking up less memory in a smartphone and made to perform over slower internet connections.

TikTok last week failed to provide a risk assessment for the spinoff app by an April 18 deadline, the commission said, demanding the company now provide it by Tuesday.

It is threatening to impose interim measures including suspending the rewards programme in the European Union “pending the assessment of its safety”.

TikTok, owned by China’s ByteDance, has until Wednesday to present a formal defence against such a measure.

The commission also warned that if TikTok failed to reply to the request, it could impose fines of up to one percent of its total annual income or of its global turnover and periodic penalties up to five percent of its average daily income or annual turnover worldwide.

TikTok said it would continue discussions with the commission and said the rewards programme was not available to minors.

Second TikTok probe

The probe is the EU’s second against TikTok under a sweeping new law, the Digital Services Act (DSA), that demands digital firms do more to police content online.

“We suspect TikTok ‘Lite’ could be as toxic and addictive as cigarettes ‘light’,” said the European Commission’s top tech enforcer, Thierry Breton.

“Unless TikTok provides compelling proof of its safety, which it has failed to do until now, we stand ready to trigger DSA interim measures including the suspension of TikTok Lite features,” Breton said.

The commission also quizzed TikTok about its measures to mitigate “systemic risks” in its Lite app and gave the platform until May 3 to respond.

TikTok Lite users can win rewards if they log in daily for 10 days, if they spend time watching videos (with an upper limit of 60 to 85 minutes per day) and if they undertake certain actions, such as liking videos and following content creators.

The commission said it believes TikTok launched the app “without prior diligent assessment of the risks it entails, in particular those related to the addictive effect of the platforms, and without taking effective risk mitigating measures”.

TikTok is among 22 “very large” digital platforms, including Amazon, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, that must comply with stricter rules under the DSA since August last year.

The law gives the EU the power to slap companies with heavy fines that could reach as high as six percent of a digital firm’s global annual revenues.

Repeat offenders can even see their platforms blocked in the 27-country European Union.

In February, the commission opened a formal probe into TikTok under the DSA over alleged violations of its obligations to protect minors online.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Australia’s PM criticises Musk’s X over stabbing footage | Social Media

Anthony Albanese says decision to challenge takedown order for content related to church stabbing ‘extraordinary’.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has criticised social media platform X for its “extraordinary” decision to fight an order by the country’s internet watchdog to remove footage of a stabbing during a livestreamed church service.

X, owned by tech entrepreneur Elon Musk, announced over the weekend that it would challenge the order to take down content related to the stabbing of an Assyrian Christian bishop during a service in western Sydney.

ESafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant said last week that X had been issued notices to remove material depicting “gratuitous or offensive violence with a high degree of impact or detail”.

“I find it extraordinary that X chose not to comply and are trying to argue their case. We know, I think overwhelmingly, Australians want misinformation and disinformation to stop,” Albanese said during a news conference.

“This isn’t about freedom of expression, this is about the dangerous implications that can occur when things that are simply not true, that everyone knows is not true, are replicated and weaponised in order to cause division and in this case, to promote negative statements and potentially to just inflame what was a very difficult situation. And social media has a social responsibility.”

On Saturday, X said it had “complied with the directive pending a legal challenge” as it did not believe that the orders were within the scope of Australian law.

“This was a tragic event and we do not allow people to praise it or call for further violence. There is a public conversation happening about the event, on X and across Australia, as is often the case when events of major public concern occur,” the social media company said in a statement.

“While X respects the right of a country to enforce its laws within its jurisdiction, the eSafety Commissioner does not have the authority to dictate what content X’s users can see globally.  We will robustly challenge this unlawful and dangerous approach in court.”

Mar Mari Emmanuel, a prominent conservative leader of the Assyrian Christ The Good Shepherd Church in Wakeley in western Sydney, suffered lacerations to his head when he was attacked last Monday during a mass service that was being broadcast online.

More than 50 police officers were injured and 20 police cars damaged in an ensuing riot outside the church.

Emmanuel, who is recovering in hospital, last week released a message saying he was “doing fine, recovering very quickly” and that he had forgiven his attacker.

On Friday, police charged a 16-year-old with terrorism offences in connection with the stabbing.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

TikTok says bill to force its sale would ‘trample’ free speech | Technology

Bill targeting Chinese-owned app goes to the US Senate after passing the House in bipartisan vote.

TikTok has slammed a bill that would ban the video-sharing app in the United States if it does not divest from its Chinese owner, accusing lawmakers of trampling on citizens’ right to free speech.

“It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans,” TikTok said in a statement on Sunday.

TikTok issued the statement after the US House on Saturday passed the bill in a 360-58 bipartisan vote, sending the legislation to the Senate.

President Joe Biden has indicated he would sign the legislation, which was included in a broader package providing aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, if it comes before his desk.

Under the legislation, Chinese company ByteDance would have nine months to divest from the app, with the possibility of a three-month extension if the president believes there has been progress towards a sale.

Both Republicans and Democrats have claimed that TikTok threatens national security as the platform could be used by Beijing to spy on Americans and manipulate public debate.

TikTok has insisted it has not shared American users’ data with the Chinese government and that it never would.

Civil liberties organisations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, have opposed the proposals on free speech grounds.

A similar bill to force the sale of TikTok passed the House last month but has since been held up in the Senate.

In 2020, then-President Donald Trump signed an executive order to ban TikTok, but the move was blocked by the courts on the grounds that it violated free speech and due process rights.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Japan’s low-key royal family takes to Instagram | Social Media News

More than 450,000 people are already following the account, which went public on Monday.

Japan’s publicity-shy royal family has joined Instagram, releasing a flurry of posts on Monday and quickly acquiring nearly half a million followers.

The first post on @kunaichi_jp (the name for the Imperial Household Agency in Japanese) showed Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako sitting on a sofa with their 22-year-old daughter Princess Aiko, smiling as they marked New Year’s Day.

The most recent, published on Tuesday, showed the royal couple visiting areas in the Noto Peninsula that were hit by January’s earthquake.

The account was announced last week and set to private until it went live on Monday.

The Imperial Household Agency said that the launch of the account was part of an attempt to give the public a better understanding of the family’s official duties and that Instagram was chosen because of its popularity among young people.

The Japanese monarchy has mythological origins stretching back more than two millennia and any public criticism of the emperor remains taboo in the country.

The Instagram posts remain highly formal, however, with no private or candid moments.

The captions are also strictly factual and there is no opportunity for the public to engage – followers can only “like” posts and cannot comment.

Those who want to send messages to the imperial family have to use the official website.

“It’s nice we get to see a bit of their activities because we hardly know what they are doing,” said Koki Yoneura, a 21-year-old student. “It’s good that they seem to be a bit closer to us.”

The account does not follow any other users.

Some social media users joked it was good the royals had chosen the more “civilised” Instagram over X, the short messaging platform which was known as Twitter until Elon Musk took control of it.

Naruhito ascended the Chrysanthemum throne in 2019 in a traditional ceremony after his popular father became the first emperor to abdicate in more than two centuries.

Other royal families around the world run active social media accounts, including the monarchies of Denmark, Malaysia and the United Kingdom.

Japan’s palace officials last year set up a team of experts to study the effects of using social media on the imperial family amid caution after a media backlash against the Emperor’s niece Mako Komuro and her commoner husband caused the marriage to be delayed.

At the time, the former princess said she suffered psychological trauma because of the media bashing, including comments from those online.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version