Nick Kyrgios settles case with Wimbledon woman he accused of being drunk

Nick Kyrgios’ Wimbledon rant over a “drunk” woman in the stands turned out to cost the combustible Aussie a lot more than the “700 drinks” he alleged her to have had back in July.

The Wimbledon runner-up paid £20,000 to a children’s charity in settling a lawsuit brought by Anna Palus, the woman in question. Kyrgios also apologized for the remarks he made about her during the Wimbledon final against Novak Djokovic.

“I told the umpire that a fan, who I now know to be Anna Palus, was distracting me during the match, believing that she was drunk,” Kyrgios said in a statement released to the media by Knight Temple Law, which represented Palus.

“I accept that belief was mistaken, and I apologize. To make amends, I have donated £20,000 to the Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity, a charity chosen by Ms. Palus. I will not be commenting on this matter again.”

Nick Kyrgios talks to chair umpire Renaud Lichtenstein during his Wimbledon final against Novak Djokovic.
Getty Images
Nick Kyrgios accused a fan of being drunk and distracting during his Wimbledon final in July.
Nick Kyrgios accused a fan of being drunk and distracting during his Wimbledon final in July.
AP

That’s not the end of Kyrgios’ legal troubles, though.

The 27-year-old is also facing an assault charge stemming from an alleged incident in December 2021 against ex-girlfriend Chiara Passari.

Passari also recently revealed that she turned to alcohol and drugs in the aftermath of her breakup with Kyrgios.

On the court, Kyrgios reached his first Grand Slam singles final at Wimbledon and followed that by winning the singles and doubles titles at the Citi Open in Washington D.C. He also reached the quarterfinals of the U.S. Open before being knocked off by Karen Khachanov, a night that ended with Kyrgios going on an epic racket-smashing tantrum.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Nick Kyrgios complains about smelling marijuana at US Open

First, there was the woman at the Wimbledon final who looked like she’d had “700 drinks, bro.” This time, it was the smell of weed that set off Nick Kyrgios.

The 27-year-old Aussie was deep in the second set of his second-round match against Benjamin Bonzi Wednesday evening at the U.S. Open when he turned to the chair umpire and started complaining about the whiff of marijuana apparently in the air at Louis Armstrong Stadium.

Up a set and at 4-3 on serve in the second, Kyrgios asked the umpire to issue a warning to the crowd after claiming he had seen and smelled someone smoking marijuana. On the way to his bench during a changeover, Kyrgios sniped, “You don’t even want to remind anyone not to do it?”

The umpire seemed to think Kyrgios was complaining about the smell of food, though, which didn’t go over well with the combustible Aussie.

“It was f–king marijuana,” he shot back. “Obviously I’m not going to be complaining about food stuff. Obviously not.

Nick Kyrgios
Getty Images

“Obviously when athletes are running side-to-side and they have asthma already it’s probably not ideal.”

The umpire addressed the crowd as the two players returned to the court, saying, “Ladies and gentlemen, a reminder that you cannot smoke on court.”

The ESPN broadcast also said their reporter on the scene likewise confirmed the smell of marijuana. Then Kyrgios went on to close out the second set, 6-4.

It was hardly the last of his blow-ups, though. Kyrgios was issued a code of conduct warning for spitting on the court after being broken late in the third set, which he went on to lose, 6-4.

It also wasn’t the first time Kyrgios found himself amid a marijuana controversy at the U.S. Open. Six years ago, he caused a stir during the tournament when he responded to a Twitter follower confirming that players on tour are allowed to smoke weed. A WADA spokesperson later confirmed that marijuana is prohibited during competition but is not banned when used outside of competition.

The good news for Kyrgios? Marijuana is also legal in New York, so there’s little chance anyone will sue him for defamation.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version