Macron and Le Pen Trade Jabs and Lean Left as French Race Heats Up

PARIS — France’s presidential election entered a new, intense phase on Tuesday as President Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen, the far-right candidate trying to unseat him, traded barbs from afar and rubbed shoulders with voters in hopes of widening their appeal, especially on the left.

Mr. Macron, who spent the day in eastern France, and Ms. Le Pen, who was campaigning in Normandy, are competing in the second round of voting in the elections, a rematch of their 2017 face-off that will be held on April 24.

In the first round of voting on Sunday, both attracted a bigger share of voters than they did five years ago — Mr. Macron with 27.85 percent of the vote, up from 24.01 in 2017, and Ms. Le Pen, of the National Rally party, with 23.15 percent. It was the largest proportion ever gained by a far-right candidate in the first round of voting, and almost 2 percentage points more than in 2017.

The latest polls predict a very close runoff, and put Mr. Macron only slightly ahead.

With less than two weeks to go before the vote, Mr. Macron has picked up the pace, seeking to dispel criticism that his campaign ahead of the first round was unfocused and that he appeared distracted by his diplomatic efforts to end the war in Ukraine.

In Mulhouse, a city in the Alsace region, Mr. Macron navigated crowds to shake the hands of those who supported him and debate those who did not, many of whom sharply questioned him on issues like purchasing power, welfare benefits and hospital funding.

“I’m on the field,” Mr. Macron pointedly told a scrum of television reporters, emphasizing that for the past two days he had chosen to meet voters in towns that had not voted for him.

He sought to portray Ms. Le Pen as unfit to govern.

Ms. Le Pen, for example, says she has no intention of leaving the European Union — but many of her promised policies would flout its rules. Mr. Macron dismissed her assurances as “carabistouilles,” an old-fashioned term that roughly translates to “claptrap” or “nonsense.”

“The election is also a referendum on Europe,” Mr. Macron said later at a public meeting in Strasbourg, where supporters waved French and European Union flags in the shadow of the city’s imposing cathedral.

Roland Lescure, a lawmaker in France’s lower house of Parliament for Mr. Macron’s party, La République en Marche, said that the campaign was now focused on getting Mr. Macron as much direct face time with voters as possible.

“The method is contact,” Mr. Lescure said, warning that there is a real risk of Ms. Le Pen being elected. “We have to campaign at full speed and until the end.”

Mr. Macron’s stature as a leader who was at the helm throughout the Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine is not enough to secure him a new term, and neither is admonishing voters about the threat of the far right, Mr. Lescure said.

“It’s not the devil against the angel,” he said. “It’s social models that are fundamentally opposed. We need to show what Marine Le Pen’s platform would do to France.”

On Tuesday, Mr. Macron was endorsed by Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s right-wing president from 2007 to 2012. Ms. Le Pen’s campaign unveiled an official poster reminiscent of Mr. Macron’s official presidential portrait. Ms. Le Pen’s has a tagline: “For all the French.”

After the collapse of France’s traditional left-wing and right-wing parties on Sunday, much of the candidates’ energy is now devoted to wooing voters who either abstained in the first round or picked Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the radical leftist and veteran politician who came in a strong third place, with 21.95 percent of the vote.

For Ms. Le Pen, that means highlighting economic proposals like a lower sales tax on essential goods, but also keeping Éric Zemmour, another far-right politician, at arm’s length.

Mr. Zemmour, a pundit who shook up French politics with his presidential bid, came in fourth on Sunday, and polls suggest that over 80 percent of those who picked him in the first round intend to vote for Ms. Le Pen in the second. That gives her little incentive to court them openly as she tries to reinvent herself in the eyes of mainstream voters.

On Tuesday, Ms. Le Pen flatly rejected the possibility of making Mr. Zemmour one of her ministers should she win, telling France Inter radio that “he doesn’t wish to and neither do I.”

For Mr. Macron, attracting Mr. Mélenchon’s voters means toning down proposals that are particularly taboo on the left, especially his plans to raise the legal age of retirement from 62 to 65, which he says is necessary to keep funding France’s state pension system.

On Monday, he insisted that he would gradually push back the retirement age by four months per year starting in 2023, but he said he was open to discussing a softening of the plan in its later stages, although how and to what degree is still unclear. During his first term, Mr. Macron’s pension proposals were derailed by massive strikes and protests.

Ms. Le Pen, speaking Tuesday at a news conference in Vernon, a town in Normandy where she also mingled with crowds, dismissed Mr. Macron’s concession as a feeble attempt to attract left-wing voters, and called his platform “social carnage.”

She detailed several proposals that she hoped would attract voters who supported Mr. Mélenchon, like creating a mechanism for referendums proposed by popular initiative, or introducing proportional representation in Parliament.

“I intend to be a president who gives the people their voice back,” she said.

Mr. Mélenchon was particularly popular with urban voters, coming ahead in cities like Lille, Marseille, Montpellier and Nantes, and he scored high with France’s youth. One study by the Ipsos and Sopra Steria polling institutes found that over 30 percent of those 35 and younger had voted for him, more than for any other candidate.

Marie Montagne, 21, and Ellina Abdellaoui, 22, both English literature students standing in front of the Sorbonne University in Paris, said that Mr. Mélenchon had not necessarily been their first choice — online quizzes suggested to Ms. Abdellaoui that she was most compatible with Philippe Poutou, a fringe anticapitalist candidate.

But Mr. Mélenchon’s leftist, ecological platform was still appealing, they said, and he seemed like the left-wing candidate best positioned to reach the runoff. Now, though, the two students said they faced a difficult choice.

“I am hesitating between abstaining and Macron,” Ms. Abdellaoui said. “I can’t vote for Le Pen.”

Ms. Montagne said she would vote for the incumbent “because I don’t want the smallest chance of the far-right passing.”

“But I won’t vote for him because I enjoy it,” she added.

Adèle Cordonnier contributed reporting.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Hochul Picked a Running Mate. Now She Has to Pick Another One.

Early in the day, as Ms. Hochul weighed Mr. Benjamin’s future, the Republican leaders in the State Legislature, as well as some Democratic state lawmakers, had called on her to demand his resignation.

“Kathy Hochul and Senate Democrats might tolerate this corruption, but New Yorkers don’t and neither do I,” said Rob Ortt, the Republican leader in the State Senate.

Ms. Hochul’s handling of Mr. Benjamin’s arrest would seem to test the pledge she made upon taking office to increase government accountability in Albany, which has been plagued for years by corruption, arrests and scandals, including, notably, the resignation of her predecessor, Andrew M. Cuomo, amid a series of sexual harassment allegations.

Rumors have swirled about whether Mr. Cuomo might attempt a political comeback by running for his old job as an independent candidate, something that would most likely be a steep climb for him.

As governor, Mr. Cuomo largely confined Ms. Hochul to a ceremonial role. In selecting Mr. Benjamin, Ms. Hochul, a former congresswoman from the Buffalo area, said she intended to entrust him with a broad policy portfolio and treat him as a governing partner — a different relationship than the one she had with Mr. Cuomo.

But Mr. Benjamin seemed somewhat of an imperfect choice.

In January 2021, a report by the local news outlet The City questioned the authenticity of numerous contributions to Mr. Benjamin’s comptroller campaign, prompting the campaign to return nearly two dozen donations.

Two months later, The Daily News reported that Mr. Benjamin had spent nearly $7,000 from his campaign account on “constituent services” to apparently pay for his wedding celebration at a Harlem jazz club in 2018, an expense that his campaign defended at the time.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Los Angeles Chargers’ NFL free-agent signings 2022 – NFL Nation

NFL free agency has been going for about a week now, and we’re keeping track of every major signing, trade and release of the 2022 offseason, with analysis from our NFL Nation reporters and grades from our experts. The new league year began March 16 at 4 p.m. ET, which means free-agent signings can be made official after that. The first round of the 2022 NFL draft begins April 28 on ESPN.

The Chargers entered free agency with a star quarterback in Justin Herbert, who was named to the Pro Bowl in his second season after throwing for 5,014 yards and 38 touchdown passes in 2021. And they were able to take care of a big offseason priority by re-signing receiver Mike Williams, who agreed to a three-year, $60 million contract, with $40 million guaranteed and $28 million in the first year of the deal after having a career year in 2021.

The Chargers are also making moves to bolster their defense, as they acquired pass rusher Khalil Mack from the Chicago Bears to provide pass-rush help to Pro Bowl Joey Bosa to combat an AFC West that’s gotten even tougher with the Denver Broncos trading for Russell Wilson.

They were also looking for a right tackle, a guard and possibly a cornerback, along with some big guys on the defensive line to shore up a rush defense that was among the NFL’s worst.

Here’s a breakdown of every 2022 NFL free-agent signing by the Los Angeles Chargers, and how each will impact the upcoming season:


The Chargers are giving the former Patriots CB a Los Angeles Chargers are giving former New England Patriots cornerback J.C. Jackson a five-year, $82.5 million deal that includes $40 million guaranteed, a source told ESPN’s Adam Schefter on Monday.

What it means: The Chargers just watched the team they share a stadium with (the Los Angeles Rams) win a Super Bowl and still have star quarterback Justin Herbert on his rookie contract. In other words, it’s time to push their chips in and go after a Super Bowl. That’s the only logical conclusion after agreeing to terms with the market’s best cornerback, trading for edge rusher Khalil Mack and re-signing receiver Mike Williams to a $20-million-a-year deal. The Chargers just missed the playoffs last year but in the uber competitive AFC, they clearly recognized that big moves were needed.

What’s the risk: Big-money free agent signings always come with some level of risk. With Jackson, the risk comes in comparable players, such as Malcolm Butler, who have soared from undrafted free agents to highly-paid No. 1 corners and not panned out. Jackson also had some struggles against Buffalo’s Stefon Diggs, raising some questions about how he’ll hold up weekly against other top wideouts. But Jackson’s 25 interceptions are the most in the NFL over the past four seasons and he’s allowed the lowest passer rating (42.0) as the nearest defender in the league since 2018. It’s risky, but worthwhile to pursue for a defense now loaded with talent. — Nick Wagoner


The former Rams defensive tackle agreed to move across town to play for the Chargers, as he will sign a three-year deal worth up to $24 million.

What it means: Joseph-Day only has to switch home locker rooms at SoFi Stadium to join his new team as the Chargers continue to spend big to bulk up their defense. Joseph-Day reunites with coach Brandon Staley (the former Rams defensive coordinator) and joins edge rusher Khalil Mack, cornerback J.C. Jackson and defensive tackle Austin Johnson as important additions to the Los Angeles defense and, like Johnson, will be tasked with improving a run defense that yielded the third most yards in the league in 2021. He finished second in the NFL in run stops per game (2.75) last season, according to Pro Football Focus.

What’s the risk: Joseph-Day was limited to just seven regular season games in 2021 because of a pectoral injury. Though that was the only time he missed in the past three seasons, it brings a bit of a question mark as he joins the Chargers. To his credit, Joseph-Day returned to play in the Super Bowl. Like with Johnson, this isn’t a bank-breaking deal, but Joseph-Day will need to avoid further injury and ramp up production for this deal to be a win for the Chargers. — Wagoner


Hopkins has signed a multi-year deal with the Chargers, according to the team.

What it means: Bringing Hopkins back was a no-brainer for the Chargers, as he provided much-needed stability in the kicking game after being signed this past October. Hopkins hit 18 of 20 field goals (90%) and 30 of 32 extra points (93.8%) after taking over for Tristan Vizcaino. Hopkins previously played for the Washington Commanders from 2015 through the first six games of 2021.

What’s the risk: Hopkins performed above his career average this past season, so he might be prone to falling back. But considering the problems the Chargers had at kicker prior to his arrival with the likes of Vizcaino and Michael Badgley, it’s worth it to them to continue to roll with Hopkins.


Covington is re-signing with the Chargers, according to the team. Contract terms were not disclosed.

What it means: The Chargers get back a role player for the interior of their defense to join free agent signings Sebastian Joseph-Day and Austin Johnson. Covington played in 16 games last season with three starts and had 52 tackles along with one sack.

What’s the risk: There appears to be very little risk by re-signing Covington. He’s coming off a career-high year for tackles and with the addition of Khalil Mack, Covington may end up with more opportunities to get to the quarterback with so much attention being paid to Mack and Joey Bosa. He could also help bolster a run defense that was among the worst in the NFL. — Josh Weinfuss


Johnson will sign a two-year deal worth up to $14 million, a source told ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler.

What it means: The Chargers continue to make significant additions to a defense that needed them. While this won’t move the needle like the Khalil Mack trade or J.C. Jackson agreement, this is a quietly solid move. Johnson has been a productive, durable player for the Giants and was one of the top run stoppers in the league in 2021 (he ranked sixth in ESPN’s run stop win rate among nose tackles). That’s important for a Chargers defense that allowed the third most rushing yards in the league last year. Los Angeles had now added an impact player at every level of its defense as it continues to build toward becoming a legitimate AFC contender in 2022.

What’s the risk: Johnson hasn’t missed a game in five seasons and though this deal isn’t anything to sneeze at, it’s also not a bank-breaking move, either. Which means there really isn’t a whole lot of risk here. Although he is probably more of a two-down player, Johnson is a logical fit who should be fine in the Chargers scheme. — Wagoner


Daniel agreed to a 1-year, $2.25 million deal, a source told ESPN’s Adam Schefter.

What it means: With Justin Herbert locked in as the starter, Daniel will return in a backup role for the Chargers. Which means if he makes the roster, Daniel will enter his 14th NFL season, all of which have been spent as a backup. Daniel has just five career starts to his name. Not many players have carved out such a niche and continued to receive significant paychecks for this long without ever getting a real shot to be a starter.

What’s the risk: There really isn’t much risk here given the price and what will be asked of Daniel. The only real risk might come in some form of opportunity cost. Which is to say it’s fair to wonder if the Chargers could have found a better backup option instead of re-signing Daniel. Still, this price tag wouldn’t prevent the Chargers from pursuing such a possibility if it were to present itself. — Wagoner


Terms of Everett’s deal were not disclosed.

What it means: The Chargers have their pass-catching tight end. Everett had the best season of his NFL career in 2021, his only year with the Seattle Seahawks, when he caught 48 passes for 478 yards and four touchdowns. The Chargers’ leading pass receiver at tight end from last season, Jared Cook, is a free agent.

What’s the risk: Everett looks like a good bet for the Chargers. He’s only 27 and his production in terms of catches and yards has increased every season since he arrived in the NFL with the Los Angeles Rams in 2017. He doesn’t have to put up big numbers to justify the signing, not with the Chargers having receivers like Mike Williams and Keenan Allen and a back like Austin Ekeler.


The Chargers signed Reeder to a one-year deal.

What it means: Reeder reunites with Chargers coach Brandon Staley, who was the Rams’ defensive coordinator in 2020. Reeder joins the Chargers after three seasons across town with the Rams. He’s played in every game the last three seasons with the Rams, compiling 91 tackles, two sacks and two interceptions. He started 13 games, including the playoffs and Super Bowl LVI.

What’s the risk: While the Chargers need reinforcements at inside linebacker, as they lost Kyzir White in free agency and saw Kenneth Murray Jr. deal with injuries and inconsistency a year ago, Reeder was not tendered by the Rams as a restricted free agent. He does have limitations in pass coverage, but perhaps familiarity with Staley will be a boon for Reeder.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

U.S. Crackdown Targets Boxing Figure Accused of Organized Crime

The U.S. government announced a severe crackdown Tuesday on Daniel Kinahan, the accused head of an Irish organized crime group who has long been involved in boxing, including with one of its biggest stars, Tyson Fury.

Bounties of $5 million were offered for information leading to the arrest and convictions of Kinahan; his father, Christy; and his brother Christy Jr. The U.S. Department of the Treasury also announced financial sanctions against the Kinahans, other members of their group and a number of connected businesses, including a sports management company based in the United Arab Emirates, where U.S. officials say Kinahan now lives.

Credit…U.S. State Department

“The Kinahan Organized Crime Group smuggles deadly narcotics, including cocaine, to Europe, and is a threat to the entire licit economy through its role in international money laundering,” Brian Nelson, the under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence at the Treasury Department, said in a statement.

Kinahan has previously been represented by the British law firm Brandsmiths in defamation cases. Adam Morallee, a partner at Brandsmiths, said in an email that he had “reached out for instructions” but had not yet heard from Kinahan. Kinahan’s lawyers in the United States did not respond to an email requesting comment on the sanctions.

At a news conference in Dublin, Greg Gatjanis, an associate director of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, compared the Kinahan group to the Camorra in Italy, the yakuza in Japan and Los Zetas in Mexico.

Outside Ireland, however, Daniel Kinahan, 44, is best known for his deep influence in boxing. In 2012, he founded MTK Global, a boxing and mixed martial arts company that represents top British boxers like Fury, Billy Joe Saunders and Michael Conlan.

MTK Global, which was not subject to sanctions by the U.S. government, said it cut ties with Kinahan after a shooting in 2016 at the Regency Hotel in Dublin at the weigh-in for a planned boxing match between Jamie Kavanagh and Antonio João Bento. According to reports in the Irish news media, Kinahan is believed to have been the target of the shooting, which killed a Kinahan associate.

John O’Driscoll, an assistant commissioner for the Irish national police service, said the shooting was a pivotal moment that led the police to stop thinking of the Kinahans as a “group of criminals located and engaged in crime in Dublin” and start thinking of them as “being a transnational organized crime group possessed of significant wealth.”

Even after the 2016 shooting, Kinahan’s connections to boxing have endured. In February he posed for a photograph with Fury in Dubai, and last month he posed for a photograph with Mauricio Sulaimán, the president of the World Boxing Council, a sanctioning organization in the sport. Kinahan was also involved in the ultimately failed negotiations to secure a lucrative two-fight deal between Fury and Anthony Joshua.

Athletes and sports officials were urged to cut all ties with the Kinahans by Drew Harris, the head of the national police service in Ireland.

“In terms of some individuals, prominent sporting individuals who are in some way connected with this grouping, I would say you need to look to your sport, to your fans, and think of your own reputation,” Harris said.

Harris also warned British broadcasters who have shown fights featuring Fury and other fighters associated with MTK Global to “look at their own business” and consider if they wanted to still be involved with them.

The sanctions against Kinahan and those associated with the Kinahan organized crime group, which authorities said were worth over a billion dollars, seek to cut them off from much of the world’s financial system. All of their property and money in the United States is blocked, and American citizens, as well as anybody else on U.S. soil, are almost entirely prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Inflation Hits Fastest Pace Since 1981, at 8.5% Through March

Inflation hit 8.5 percent in the United States last month, the fastest 12-month pace since 1981, as a surge in gasoline prices tied to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine added to sharp increases coming from the collision of strong demand and stubborn pandemic-related supply shortages.

Fuel prices jumped to record levels across much of the nation and grocery costs soared, the Labor Department said Tuesday in its monthly report on the Consumer Price Index. The price pressures have been painful for American households, especially those that have lower incomes and devote a big share of their budgets to necessities.

But the news was not uniformly bad: A measure that strips out volatile food and fuel prices decelerated slightly from February as used car prices swooned. Economists and policymakers took that as a sign that inflation in goods might be starting to cool off after climbing at a breakneck pace for much of the past year.

In fact, several economists said March may be a high-water mark for overall inflation. Price increases could begin abating in the coming months in part because gasoline prices have declined somewhat — the national average for a gallon was $4.10 on Tuesday, according to AAA, down from a $4.33 peak in March. Some researchers also expect consumers to stop buying so many goods, whether furniture or outdoor equipment, which could begin to take pressure off overtaxed supply chains.

“These numbers are likely to represent something of a peak,” said Gregory Daco, the chief economist at Ernst & Young’s strategy consultancy, EY-Parthenon. Still, he said, it will be crucial to watch whether price increases excluding food and fuel — so-called core prices — slow down in the months ahead.

A letup would be welcome news for the White House, because inflation has become a major liability for Democrats as midterm elections approach in November. Public confidence in the economy has fallen sharply, and as rapid price increases undermine support for President Biden and his party, they could imperil their control of Congress.

While inflation is up across much of the world as economies adjust to the pandemic and share supply-chain problems, core prices have risen more sharply in the United States than in places like Europe and Japan.

That has handed Republicans a talking point, especially as prices overwhelm recent wage growth. Average hourly earnings were up 5.6 percent in March, according to the Labor Department. But adjusted for inflation, average pay was down 2.7 percent.

“Americans’ paychecks are worth less and less each month,” Senator Patrick J. Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania, wrote on Twitter after the report.

While the Federal Reserve has primary responsibility for controlling inflation, the administration has taken steps to combat price increases. Mr. Biden announced on Tuesday that a summertime ban on sales of higher-ethanol gasoline blends would be suspended this year, a move that White House officials said was aimed at lowering gas prices.

The action followed the president’s decision last month to release one million barrels of oil a day from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve over the next six months.

“I’m doing everything within my powers, by executive order, to bring down the prices and address the Putin price hike,” Mr. Biden said in Iowa on Tuesday afternoon, referring to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. Inflation had risen sharply before the war in Ukraine, though the conflict has added to the pressure on energy and commodity prices.

There are a few hopeful signs that inflation could slow in the months ahead.

The first is largely mechanical. Prices began to pop last spring, which means changes will be measured against a higher year-ago number in the months ahead.

More fundamentally, March’s data showed that prices for some goods, including used cars and apparel, moderated or even fell — though the signal was somewhat inconsistent, with furniture prices rising sharply. If rapid inflation in prices for goods does wane, it could help overall inflation subside.

“It’s very welcome to see the moderation in this category,” said Lael Brainard, a Fed governor and Mr. Biden’s nominee to be the central bank’s next vice chair, in an online appearance hosted by The Wall Street Journal. “I’ll be looking to see whether we continue to see moderation in the months ahead.”

Between the slowdown in gasoline prices this month and a potential easing of goods prices, even economists who have long expressed concern about inflation said it might begin to ease.

“It’s better-than-even odds that we’re not going to see a number above 8.5 percent this year,” said Jason Furman, a Harvard economist who served as chair of President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers.

But even if inflation slows slightly, it is likely to spend 2022 running far above the Fed’s goal, which it defines as 2 percent on average using a related but more delayed price index.

The critical question is how much and how quickly prices will come down, and recent developments ramp up the risks that uncomfortably rapid inflation could linger.

Services costs, including rent and other housing expenses, are increasing more rapidly. Those measures move slowly, and are likely to be a major factor determining the course of inflation.

Wages are up sharply, pushing costs up for employers and potentially prompting them to lift prices. Businesses may feel that they have the power to pass rising costs along to customers, and even to expand their profits, because consumers have continued to spend during a full year of rapid price increases.

And cheaper goods are not guaranteed. A coronavirus outbreak is shuttering cities and disrupting production in China, and the war in Ukraine adds a huge dose of uncertainty about commodity prices and supply chains.

“The impact from these commodity price shocks, they can take a while to make it through the economy,” said Tim Mahedy, senior economist at the tax and advisory firm KPMG U.S.

After a long stretch of rapid inflation, America’s central bank is reacting, rather than waiting to see what happens next. Fed officials began raising interest rates last month and have signaled that they will continue to push them up “expeditiously” as they try to rein in lending, spending and demand, hoping to prevent steep price increases from becoming a more permanent feature of the U.S. economy.

“It’s been a shock: We went for a decade in which we could not get inflation to 2 percent,” Christopher J. Waller, a Fed governor, said during an event on Monday. “We’re hoping that it will go away relatively fast, that’s our job, and we’re going to get it done.”

Policymakers are expected to make a half-point interest rate increase at their meeting in early May, and have indicated that they will soon begin to quickly shrink their bond holdings, a change that should reinforce higher rates and soften demand. Ms. Brainard suggested on Tuesday that such a plan could be announced as soon as May, and go into effect as soon as June.

While she predicted that consumer demand would ease in the coming months as the government provided less financial help to households than in 2021 and as borrowing costs climbed, Ms. Brainard cited the war in Ukraine and Chinese lockdowns as risks that could curtail supply and keep inflation elevated.

In a recent Bloomberg survey of economists, the median inflation forecast for the final three months of this year was 5.4 percent over the prior year — well above the Fed’s goal. Businesses and consumers regularly say rapid inflation is disrupting their economic lives, and many are voicing concerns that it will not quickly evaporate.

“Even if the economy slows down, it’s not going to feel like it’s slowed down to the builders, to people that have building products companies, to the trucking companies,” said Crissy Wieck, chief sales officer at the trucking company Western Express, during a Fed-hosted panel on Monday.

She noted that truckers typically buy trucks when shipping demand is as hot as it is now, lured by the promise of high pay — but because of a truck shortage, that additional capacity could be years away.

“That supply chain and supply-demand ratio isn’t going to correct,” she said.

Ben Casselman and Ana Swanson contributed reporting.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Ukraine Says It Thwarted a Sophisticated Russian Cyberattack on Its Power Grid

The attackers may have broken into the electrical company’s systems as early as February, Ukrainian officials said, but they emphasized that some details of the attack, including how the intruders made their way into the company’s systems, were not yet known.

Officials declined to name the company that suffered the breach and the region its substations are in, citing fears of continuing cyberattacks.

“It is self-evident that the aggressor’s team, the malefactors, had enough time to get prepared very thoroughly and they planned the execution on a sophisticated, high-quality level,” said Victor Zhora, the deputy head of Ukraine’s cybersecurity agency, the State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection. “It looks that we have been very lucky that we were able to respond in a timely manner to this cyberattack.”

Ukrainian companies in finance, media and energy have been subject to regular cyberattacks since the war began, according to Mr. Zhora. His agency said that since Russia’s invasion began, it had recorded three times as many attacks as it had tracked in the previous year.

The use of wiper malware has become a persistent problem in Ukraine since the war began, with attacks hitting Ukrainian critical infrastructure, including government agencies responsible for food safety, finance and law enforcement, cybersecurity researchers said.

Hackers have also broken into communications systems, including satellite communication services and telecom companies. Investigations into those breaches are continuing, although cybersecurity analysts and U.S. officials believe Russia is responsible. Other hacking groups, including one affiliated with Belarus, have broken into media companies’ systems and social media accounts of high-profile military officials, trying to spread disinformation that claimed Ukraine planned to surrender.

“They are targeting critical infrastructure; however, these attempts were not so sophisticated as compared to today’s recent attack,” Mr. Zhora said of the recent hacking campaigns against Ukrainian companies.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Belarus-born crypto platform halts operations for Russians in response to invasion of Ukraine

Crypto trading company Currency.com has announced it halted operations for clients based in Russia following the country’s “violence and disorder” imposed on the people of Ukraine.

In a Tuesday announcement, Currency.com said Russian residents would no longer be able to access its services following the platform’s decision to stop Russia-based clients from opening new accounts. According to Currency.com’s website, the Gibraltar-based crypto trading platform has offices in Kyiv, London, and Vilnius, but was previously licensed and headquartered in Belarus.

“We condemn the Russian aggression in the strongest possible terms,” said Vitalii Kedyk, head of strategy for the platform’s London operations and CEO of Currency.com’s Ukraine arm. “In these circumstances we can no longer continue to serve our clients from Russia.”

Major crypto exchanges have responded to calls on social media to either freeze Russian digital assets or otherwise restrict access for residents amid the country’s military invading Ukraine. A Binance spokesperson told Cointelegraph in February that the exchange would not “unilaterally freeze millions of innocent users’ accounts,” while Kraken CEO Jesse Powell hinted that the only way it would cut off Russian users’ access to crypto would be in response to sanctions.

Related: How crypto became a major source of relief for embattled Ukraine

However, many private businesses including credit card companies Visa and Mastercard have announced following Feb. 24 that they will be scaling down or entirely stopping operations in Russia in response to the war. Ukraine’s government, in contrast, has utilized crypto platforms to solicit donations from around the world, raising more than $60 million as of the time of publication.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Opinion | When You Hear the F-Word, Try Picking Up More Than One Meaning

But there are intermediate cases between basic meaning and bona fide idiom. When we say that someone threw up, is that an idiom? Part of the essence of an idiom is that you wouldn’t immediately know its meaning out of context — “chewing the fat,” “being stood up,” “throw that up to me,” etc. In contrast, the relationship of “throw up” to throwing is, upon a bit of reflection, rather obvious; it’s why people also say “hurl” or “upchuck” to mean the same thing. If people are learning English, do we consider their recognition that this is how we routinely refer to that action as having grasped one of our idioms? Not really. “Throw up,” in this sense, is a word that happens to have two parts that we write separately.

What we think of as one word with one meaning can in use actually be many, many more words, and not just in the sense of stark and obvious homonyms such as “spring” as a season and “spring” as a coil. This is beautifully illustrated with my favorite example: “pick up.” Its basic meaning is to lift something. But we also pick up our kids from school. Someone might pick someone up at a bar. You pick up a disease, or someone says you’ve picked up the habit of overusing certain salty words. In all those cases, we see a relationship with the “lift” meaning. Few would say that when we talk of picking up our kids, we are tossing in an idiom. Rather, these uses of “pick up” are something more mundane than idioms; they are words of their own.

That these are separate words is especially clear when the relationship with lifting gets more abstract: A car picks up speed; a cocktail picks up your spirits; we pick up a sound from far off; we pick up where we left off. Yes, “pick” and “up” are words in their own right, but in this case a combination of the two is the source of what are actually many more words, and this is the case with countless others. Think a bit about the different things “make up” can mean, for example. Yet no one would be accused of overusing the words “pick” or “make,” much less the word “up.” The key is how we use them.

And this brings us back to the profanity issue. When we perceive a word as used a lot or too much, it’s often being used to mean multiple things. The casual usage of “like” divides into about four different usages, some having drifted pretty dramatically from its stock definition. The N-word that ends with “er” and the N-word that ends with “a” are, for all intents and purposes (idiom alert!), different words now, and the latter is also developing into, of all things, new pronouns. What we might hear as a mere matter of yet another F-bomb is actually a vocabular sapling sprouting apace, with branches growing in different directions. As I put it in “Nine Nasty Words” (with wording a notch too zesty to print here), the F-word can convey destruction, deception, dismissal, dauntingness and down-to-earthness.

Russian speakers seem to get this more readily about profanity than English speakers. There is a tradition among Russians of cherishing its richness; for example, a Russian I am especially fond of has given me dense, sober volumes chronicling and exploring their profanity. Hence, what some bemoan as too much profanity is, to me, the equivalent of the glories of what Russians call mat, or dirty language. As the writer Edward Topol wrote in “Dermo!: The Real Russian Tolstoy Never Used,” a nonnative speaker who learns “even one-third of this lexicon can be sure of being the most popular and honored foreigner at any Russian gathering.”

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Real Madrid vs Chelsea FC: Result, Ratings and Quotes


Result

Chelsea and Real Madrid played out the second leg of their Champions League quarter-final clash on Tuesday evening.

Madrid, of course, headed into the game at the Bernabeu as clear favourites to progress after a Karim Benzema masterclass in the reverse fixture that saw Real run out 3-1 victors on the day.

And, despite Chelsea’s best efforts, they were unable to overturn that deficit this week.

The tie started fairly end-to-end, but it was actually Chelsea who took the lead 14 minutes in when Mason Mount latched onto a through ball from Timo Werner before curling one past Thibaut Courtois.

Chelsea then added their second of the day five minutes into the second half as Antonio Rudiger directed his header goalward.

Chelsea thought they had completed their historic comeback 74 minutes in when Timo Werner was slipped in before sitting down three players and slotting past Courtois.

However, some magic from Luka Modric brought Real back on level terms just six minutes later.

Karim Benzema then stepped up five minutes into extra time to put Madrid in front and win them the tie.

Advertisement

Open Account Offer. Bet £10 & Get £50 in Free Bets for new customers at bet365. Min deposit requirement. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits and are available for use upon settlement of bets to value of qualifying deposit. Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. Time limits and T&Cs apply. 18+. begambleaware.org. UK & ROI residents only

Real Madrid player ratings

Thibaut Courtois (6) – Should have done a lot better with Werner’s goal. Was a composed figure late on when needed.

Daniel Carvajal (4.5) – Poor tracking of Werner for Chelsea’s third of the night.

Nacho Fernandez (5.5) – Didn’t do a lot wrong on the night but still allowed three Chelsea goals.

David Alaba (4.5) – Dragged out of position for the Mount opener.

Ferland Mendy (4) – Struggled to deal with the threat of Loftus-Cheek and Reece James down Chelsea’s right.

Casemiro (3) – Had trouble picking up Loftus-Cheek, who was constantly drifting into a central spot from his right-wing-back role. Lucky not to give away a penalty for his trip on Havertz early in the second half. Off after 78 minutes.

Luka Modric (8) – Quiet first half and was at fault for Chelsea’s second goal, being all too easily shoved to the ground by Rudiger. However, he then played a simply sensational ball to Rodrygo late in normal time to bring Madrid back on level terms and was the home side’s best player in extra time.

Toni Kroos (5) – Taken off after 73 minutes after a largely ineffective showing.

Federico Valverde (6) – Didn’t offer much going forward but was good at tracking back.

Karim Benzema (7) – The Frenchman’s threat was largely neutralised in the first 45, being reduced to one long-range effort that nearly caused a problem for Mendy due to a deflection. Hit the bar with a header 65 minutes in and then scored the crucial goal 95 minutes in.

Vinicius Junior (6.5) – Caused Chelsea issues down their right-hand side due to his blistering pace. Good cross for the Benzema goal.

Substitutes

Edouardo Camavinga (6) – A much livelier presence than the likes of Kross and Casemiro.

Marcelo (5.5) – Much more effective than Mendy when he came on and was key to finding Modric in the build-up to Madrid’s first.

Rodrygo (6) – Excellent finish for the Madrid equaliser 80 minutes in.

Lucas Vazquez (5) – Made a few decent blocks and tackles.

Dani Ceballos (N/A) – Not on the pitch long enough.

Chelsea player ratings

Edouard Mendy (5.5) – Had nothing to do in the first half except make one punch. Couldn’t do much about the Rodrygo goal and was then wrong-footed for Benzema’s winner.

Reece James (6.5) – Had the unenvious task of dealing with Vinicius Junior on the night, a task that was made a lot harder when James picked up a yellow for a foul on the Brazilian less than 10 minutes in.

James kept the South American quiet for large periods but was not tracking him when he set up Benzema.

Thiago Silva (6) – Did a good job keeping Benzema quiet in the first 45. Poor marking of Rodrygo for his goal.

Antonio Rudiger (7) – Helped neutralise Benzema’s threat in 90 minutes and was also a useful asset going forward thanks to his aerial prowess – he scored a header for the second goal of the day. However, he slipped when attempting to challenge Benzema when he scored Madrid’s second.

Marcos Alonso (5.5) – Sloppy in possession early on and did not track Rodrygo well for his goal. Thought he had scored Chelsea’s third of the day, but it was ruled out by VAR.

N’Golo Kante (6) – A much brighter start to this game than the first leg, with Kante completing 34 of his 39 passes in the first half on Tuesday – 16 more than he manged in the first half of the reverse fixture. However, the Frenchman tired as the game wore on and his pressing of Vinicius was poor in the build-up to Benzema’s goal. Off after 100 minutes.

Mateo Kovacic (7.5) – Started the match well, tracking back to help out Chelsea’s back four and breaking up play with some key interceptions and tackles. Also provided the through ball for Chelsea’s third.

Ruben Loftus-Cheek (7) – Made a clever run into the centre of the pitch, which dragged David Alaba out of position, to provide the pre-assist for Mount’s opener. Could have tracked Vinicius better for Real’s winner.

Mason Mount (8) – Poor in possession at the start of the match but he would score the opener with a lovely, curled finish and also set up Rudiger for the second.

Kai Havertz (6) – Passing was solid and attempted to press from the front. Very unlucky not to have won his side a penalty early in the second 45. Missed a huge chance late on.

Timo Werner (8) – Provided the assist for Mount’s opener and was then incredibly composed to net Chelsea’s third. Taken off after 83 minutes.

Substitutes

Christian Pulisic (3) – Had two chances in normal time but mishit them both.

Hakim Ziyech (3) – Created very little when brought on.

Saul Niguez (2) – Offered very little when brought on. A poor sub by Tuchel.

Jorginho (3) – Dragged a shot wide in the dying moments when he should have at least tested the keeper.

What they said

 

 

Click here to view our latest Premier League betting tips.

The Premier League table as it stands

# Team MP W D L F A D P
1 Manchester City 31 23 5 3 72 20 52 74
2 Liverpool FC 31 22 7 2 79 22 57 73
3 Chelsea FC 30 18 8 4 64 23 41 62
4 Tottenham Hotspur 31 18 3 10 56 37 19 57
5 Arsenal FC 30 17 3 10 45 36 9 54
6 West Ham United 32 15 6 11 51 42 9 51
7 Manchester United 31 14 9 8 49 42 7 51
8 Wolverhampton Wanderers 32 15 4 13 33 28 5 49
9 Leicester City 29 11 7 11 45 48 -3 40
10 Crystal Palace 31 8 13 10 43 40 3 37
11 Brighton & Hove Albion 31 8 13 10 28 37 -9 37
12 Aston Villa 31 11 3 17 42 46 -4 36
13 Brentford FC 32 10 6 16 39 48 -9 36
14 Southampton FC 31 8 12 11 37 52 -15 36
15 Newcastle United 31 8 10 13 34 54 -20 34
16 Leeds United 32 8 9 15 38 68 -30 33
17 Everton FC 30 8 4 18 33 52 -19 28
18 Burnley FC 30 4 12 14 25 44 -19 24
19 Watford FC 31 6 4 21 29 60 -31 22
20 Norwich City 31 5 6 20 20 63 -43 21

Last updated: 1 min ago


Chelsea betting odds, next game:

Chelsea vs Crystal Palace odds: result, both teams to score, correct score & goalscorers

Chelsea vs Crystal Palace Result/Both teams score Yes No
Chelsea 13/5 6/4
Crystal Palace 10/1
Draw 9/2 10/1

What time is kick off between Real Madrid vs Chelsea FC?

19:00, Tuesday 12 April 2022



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

REPORT: Stephen Curry Remains a ‘Close Call’ for Game 1 Vs. Nuggets

Stephen Curry reportedly remains a “close-call” for Game 1 of the Warriors’ first-round playoff series against the Nuggets.

Curre suffered a left foot sprain nearly a month ago against the Celtics. The two-time MVP missed the final 12 games of the regular season as he recovered. According to the Warriors, Curry has continued to “make good progress” in his rehab and began on-court activities last week. He could reportedly return to full-team practices sometime this week.

Per the Warriors, Curry’s eventual return to game action is undetermined and will be based on his continued progress.



Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version