‘Batgirl’ Guide to Release Date, Cast News, and Spoilers

It’s almost as if Leslie Grace was destined to end up in Gotham.

The In the Heights star and Latin pop singer didn’t grow up reading DC comics or watching superhero shows, but she and her childhood best friend nicknamed themselves after the caped crusader and his sidekick. “We always got into trouble as kids, so we started calling each other Batman and Robin,” she previously told ELLE.com. So when she learned she was cast as Batgirl (amid a tight race for the coveted role), her BFF knew it felt like fate. “[She] was like ‘All this time, we’ve been manifesting this,’” Grace said.

A standalone Batgirl film has been in the works with Warner Bros. and DC since 2017, and Grace’s casting was announced in 2021. However, a year later, the film has been scrapped just months away from release. Here’s what we know.

More From ELLE
 

Why did Batgirl get scrapped?

Batgirl was expected to arrive sometime in 2022 on HBO Max, but on Aug. 2, reports broke, initially from The New York Post, that Warner Bros. wouldn’t be releasing the film at all, theatrically or online.

Per The Hollywood Reporter, “The unusual move comes after a change in leadership at Warners, with newly installed Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav prioritizing on cost-cutting measures and refocusing Warners on theatrical films rather than creating projects straight for streaming, as had been a priority for former WarnerMedia CEO Jason Kilar.”

The film—with a reported budget of $80 million and actual costs nearing $90 million due to COVID protocols—had already finished shooting, THR reports. Sources told the outlet that costly projects made only for streaming don’t align with the company’s new strategy.

The Wrap reported earlier that, according to insiders, the studio heads decided Batgirl simply didn’t work, even with reshoots and an increased budget. The new management is “committed to making DC titles big theatrical event films, and ‘Batgirl’ isn’t that,” per The Wrap. However, the studio reportedly loves Grace and the film’s directors, and want to work with them in the future.

And according to Variety, “Studio insiders insist the decision was not driven by the quality of the film or the commitment of the filmmakers, but by the desire for the studio’s slate of DC features to be at a blockbuster scale. ‘Batgirl’ was budgeted to screen in homes on HBO Max, and not for a major global release in theaters.” (For reference, the Robert Pattinson-starring Batman, which released primarily in theaters, cost $185 million.)

Still, as the outlet points out, it’s surprising to see the studio drop Batgirl entirely rather than try to make up for some of the costs with a smaller release.

What is Batgirl about?

The film was meant to follow Barbara Gordon, daughter of Gotham’s police commissioner (and famous Batman ally) James Gordon, taking the alias of Batgirl. Grace also teased a bit of Barbara’s story to ELLE.com:

“I can’t say much about what she is going to do, but Batgirl becomes her own hero. [Her origin story] is crazy dark, like a lot of other superheroes, but I like that she becomes Batgirl because she wants to make a difference in the world. She feels like people underestimate her as Barbara Gordon, and I relate to that.”

The actress also hinted at some of the stunt work she’d be doing in the role, speaking to Variety: “There’s crazy fire. There’s crazy stunts, crazy drops. She’s a biker chick, so you’re going to see her do a bunch of badassery.”

This marks the third onscreen iteration of the caped superheroine, per The Hollywood Reporter. She debuted on TV in 1961 as Betty Kane (played by Yvonne Craig) then appeared again in the 1997 Batman & Robin film (starring Alicia Silverstone as Barbara Wilson).

Who’s in the cast?

Michael Keaton was set to make his grand return as Batman. J. K. Simmons, who played Commissioner James Gordon in Justice League, was going to reprise his role too.

Mummy star Brendan Fraser had joined as the pyromaniac supervillain Firefly, Deadline reported in October. And Jacob Scipio, breakout star of Bad Boys for Life, was also onboard as mobster Anthony “Tony” Bressi.

Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah (Bad Boys For Life) were directing, Christina Hodson (Birds of Prey) wrote the script, and Kristin Burr (Cruella) was producing. Joss Whedon had initially signed on to write and direct the film before dropping out in 2018.

Leslie Grace has shared a sneak peek at her Batgirl costume.

On January 14, Grace shared a shot of herself in the Batgirl costume, standing against a Gotham building backdrop. The suit has a blue cast to it, a gold utility belt, what looks like a weapon strapped to her thigh, and a short cape lined with yellow. Grace’s hair flows free in the wind behind her.

She captioned the image, “‘I use their expectations against them. That will be their weakness. Not mine. Let them all underestimate me…And when their guard is down, and their pride is rising, let me kick their butts.’ – Batgirl, Year One.”

Sign Up for HBO Max

This story has been updated.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson Are Taking Their Relationship More Seriously

Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson’s relationship has been heating up quickly, a source told Us Weekly. The couple began dating in the fall of 2021, shortly after connecting on the set of Saturday Night Live after Kardashian served as the show’s host.

“They both have busy schedules at the moment, but are still making time to be together,” the insider explained. “They’re very much enjoying spending time together.”

Davidson has been filming in Australia, so Kardashian traveled earlier this month to visit him on set.

“It’s quite romantic,” the source added.

Speculation on their relationship is more intense because Davidson recently said in an interview with Kevin Hart on Peacock’s Hart to Heart that he has been seriously considering having children.

“[I’m] definitely a family guy. My favorite thing ever, which I have yet to achieve, I wanna have a kid. That’s like my dream,” Davidson said. “It’s like, super corny, [but] it would be so fun. Dress up the little dude. It’s just like, I’m so excited for that chapter… That’s kind of what I’m just preparing for now, is just trying to be as good as a dude, develop and get better so when that happens it’s just easier.”

He also said he definitely wants to get married someday, but he’s been hesitant to say all of this until now.

“Since my dad died, I was like, ‘Oh, I can’t wait to have a kid.’ And like, I don’t like saying corny s–t — the reasoning was like, ‘I don’t want a kid to ever feel like how I feel right now,’” Davidson explained. “It wasn’t his fault [that] he passed away. But just to be there so that someone doesn’t have to feel like that. I’m very excited to do that for someone and watch them have what I didn’t.”

Apparently, Kardashian has considered children with Davidson as well and might be open to it.

“Pete would make a great dad,” the insider said. “He’s goofy and fun to be around. He wants to be a big role model for his kid/kids — something he missed out on sadly after his father passed away when he was younger. He has a really good heart and comes from a good place. He can’t wait to be a dad.”

Kardashian has four children with her ex, Kanye West: North, 9, Saint, 6, Chicago, 4, and Psalm, 3. Davidson has met them and they apparently get along great.

“Kim loves how great Pete is with the kids. He’s a big kid himself and makes them laugh,” another insider said earlier this year. “Kim and Pete are very in sync right now, they’re very in step with each other and the relationship is easy. They’re getting closer and closer and are a really great pair.”

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker Make Out in Malibu

Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker signaled that he’s recovering well following his hospitalization earlier this month when the two were photographed making out in Malibu over the weekend.

Coleman Rayner

This is one of the first times Kardashian and Barker have been spotted out and about and being affectionate since Barker was released from the hospital following treatment for pancreatitis.

The couple released statements after Barker was discharged. Barker wrote, “I went in for an endoscopy Monday feeling great. But After dinner, I developed excruciating pain and have been hospitalized ever since. During the endoscopy, I had a very small polyp removed right in a very sensitive area, usually handled by specialists, which unfortunately damaged a critical pancreatic drainage tube. This resulted in severe life threatening pancreatitis. I am so very very grateful that with intensive treatment I am currently much better.”

Kardashian wrote, “Oh what a scary and emotional week it has been. Our health is everything and sometimes we take for granted how quickly it can change. Travis and I went in for a routine endoscopy together and he ended up with severe, life-threatening pancreatitis. I am so grateful to God for healing my husband, for all of your prayers for him and for us, for the overwhelming outpouring of love and support. I am so touched and appreciative.”

Kardashian and Barker got married legally in in mid-May. They had a bigger wedding in Italy later that month.

A source detailed to Entertainment Tonight last week how Barker’s health scare changed their dynamic. “Kourtney has dropped everything to make sure that Travis is quickly on the mend,” the source said. “Being newlyweds, they weren’t anticipating this, but after what Travis went through and what they went through together, it made them even stronger and more connected. Kourtney refused to leave his side until she knew he was going to be okay and put a halt on everything, like filming and work commitments.”

“She was only concerned with Travis’s well-being,” the source continued. “Travis and Kourtney have been together even more than they were before, including coming to visit him at the studio, since it gave her such a scare. Kourtney is now more appreciative of their time together more than ever.”

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Who Is Nina Lin in ‘Only Murders in the Building’?

Spoilers ahead.

Season 2 of Only Murders in the Building has brought us a slew of new characters including mysterious artist Alice, played by Cara Delevingne; Amy Schumer, played by, well, Amy Schumer; and Bunny’s mother, played by the legendary Shirley MacLaine. But we also get some other surprise newcomers, such as incoming Arconia board president Nina Lin, played by Dave and Tigertail star Christine Ko. While we only caught a glimpse of her in the season’s first two episodes, we learned a little bit more about her this week, and I’m not sure if the details are entirely comforting.

This content is imported from Instagram. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

The first thing you need to know about Nina is that she’s incredibly on top of her shit. As we see in a flashback to Bunny’s final day, she’s memorized the Arconia rulebook inside out, which makes her a fitting successor to lead the Arconia board. She knows who to call to fix the bulb in the fountain or lay out floor mats when it starts to snow. She knows that the mops are in the window closet, second door from the stairs. She has such a keen eye for detail that she’s noticed the flowers by the elevator need refreshing. Nina is extremely dedicated to the role, even before she’s officially started and even though she’s pregnant. So pregnant, in fact, that she’s trying to induce labor with a special ankle massage while whispering to her womb, “Come on, eject!” On top of all that, she’s also impeccably dressed. In episode 3, the hedge fund manager-by-day exudes cozy-chic in her off-white coat, red dress, knit headband, and cream heeled booties. What can’t this woman do—except perhaps evade suspicions of murder?

Nina (center) at Bunny’s surprise retirement party.

Craig Blankenhorn/Hulu

Only Murders is a whodunnit, after all, with Bunny Folger (Jayne Houdyshell) slain and her killer still unknown. But could Nina be the killer? Her relationship with Bunny began as a sweet mentorship, but when Bunny decided not to retire as board president in the end, thus keeping Nina from the promotion, they get into a bitter fight and Nina’s ulterior motives are exposed. She resents that Bunny became board president because of nepotism (her mother had the same role) and, more importantly, believe Bunny is keeping the Arconia in the past. Nina has a plan to “modernize” and “monetize” the historical building, to bring it into the 21st century, and she won’t let a “relic” like Bunny stop her.

Now, we’ve gotten hints of Nina’s ferocity before. In an earlier episode, Howard warned that she’s is a bigger “bitch” than the no-nonsense Bunny, and Nina said herself that she would give the Arconia residents “hell” if they didn’t follow the building rules. But is that enough to convince us that she’s a potential murderer? Was she so dead-set on becoming board president that she killed Bunny for the coveted role? Or is that all a little too obvious?

All we know is that by the end of the episode we see how Bunny dies: She answers a knock at the door of her apartment (thinking it’s Charles, Mabel, or Oliver) to find a mysterious visitor (whom we can’t see). While the person remains unidentified, they seem to be someone Bunny knows; when she opens the door, she asks, “What the fuck do you you want?hinting that she recognizes the face. The person responds by attacking Bunny, stabbing her to death. Whether that late-night visitor was a jealous mentee or someone else remains up in the air.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Cameron Diaz and Benji Madden Were Seen Kissing at Adele’s Concert

On Friday night, 65,000 people gathered for the the BST Hyde Park Festival in London to watch Adele take the stage, and in the crowd were actress Cameron Diaz and her husband Benji Madden. Photographers snapped pics of the couple getting groovy and very affectionate as they took in the Grammy-award winner’s performance.

The pair have been married since 2015 and have a 2-year-old daughter named Raddix Madden, but their romance is obviously still very much alive. They were seated in the VIP section, clearly enjoying their date night as they laughed and kissed throughout the show.

Adele is good friends with the couple’s sister-in-law, Nicole Ritchie, so it probably wasn’t too hard to get the quality seats. Also in the VIP section was actor Tom Cruise, who apparently enjoys Adele’s lovelorn ballads. Other celebrities at the show included James Corden, Cameron Diaz, Niall Horan and Milly Bobby Brown.

Adele admitted to the audience that it was an emotional moment for her to be returning to the stage after so long since her last live performance in Wembley in 2017, but soon into her set she declared, “My god, I’m back at home.”

The show opened with “Hello,” and included classic hits “Rolling In The Deep” and “Someone Like You.” She did perform five tracks from her latest album, 30, as well.

The singer was set to open her Las Vegas residency in January of this year, but ended up postponing the start of her running show. In a new interview with the BBC, she said that the backlash to that decision was very difficult to face, and left her a “shell of a person” for a while. She also said that the new dates for her upcoming residency should be announced soon.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Reactions to ‘Only Murders in the Building’ Season 2 Episode 1

We’re back at the Arconia, the fireworks are sparkling in Charles Haden-Savage’s imagination, and wouldn’t you know it—more people are dead! Last season’s finale of the hilarious murder-mystery comedy Only Murders in the Building ended, as expected, on a quaint note: Mabel Mora (Selena Gomez) returned to her apartment in the famed Upper West Side building to discover the building president, Bunny Folger (Jayne Houdyshell), bleeding to death, one of Mabel’s knitting needles sticking out of her chest. Mabel’s new friends Charles (Steve Martin) and Oliver Putnam (Martin Short) rush down the stairs to discover her kneeling over Bunny’s dead body. She insists “it’s not what you think,” but the police who handcuff each of the amateur podcast co-creators aren’t so sure. In the words of Charles himself, this takes the investigation into a whole new direction.

At the top of season 2, episode 1, “Persons of Interest,” Charles, Mabel, and Oliver are each in the hot seat, under the withering glare of police officers Detective Williams (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) and Detective Kreps (Michael Rapaport), the latter of whom likes to “say ‘fuck’ a lot” and refers to Charles and Oliver as “low-hanging, dehydrated scrota-sacks.” Williams wants to believe that none of these idiots could have killed Bunny, but the circumstances are a little too funky to ignore. (It doesn’t help that, in the podcast they co-created, Mabel talks about a “recurring dream” in which she stabs an intruder with her knitting needle.) Neither Charles nor Oliver are thrilled about their names scrawled onto the suspect list alongside Mabel’s—Oliver even demonstrates his characteristic willingness to throw a friend under the bus—but there’s one key point saving them: The police don’t have the murder weapon, which was not a knitting needle but a knife.

Williams lets them go, but with the knowledge that they’re persons of interest, and New York City, ever hungry for gossip, is watching. When the trio emerge out onto the courthouse steps, they’re instantly surrounded by cameras—a development about which Oliver makes no attempt to hide his glee. (Short’s line deliveries are as intelligent and vivacious as ever, with “I’m just like you!” a standout this episode.)

As the friends attempt to return to their lives, it’s Mabel who objects to the idea of investigating Bunny’s murder. Sure, she wants her name cleared, but she’s also sick of living a life constantly infused with death. Her former friend Tim Kono (Julian Cihi) was murdered last season by his ex-lover Jan (Amy Ryan), who almost succeeded in killing Charles, too. She’s ready to spend a few months or years as a “boring” 20-something with old-guy friends who play chess in the park. But, of course, that’s not what the Arconia has in store for them.

In spite of all the murders, life at the Arconia moves on. There’s a new tenant taking over Sting’s old unit: Amy Schumer, playing Amy Schumer. (Not all OMitB fans were thrilled with this development.) For reasons that don’t make much sense, she wants to work with Oliver on optioning the trio’s podcast for a streaming series “with exclusive internet content leading to gamification,” and Oliver practically combusts on the spot. He’s not the only one with third-party attention, either; Charles is invited to a meeting regarding a reboot of Brazzos, the cop serial he starred in as a young(er) actor. And Mabel, she’s caught the attention of Alice Banks (Cara Delevingne), an art collector interested in the mural Mabel painted in her apartment. She invites Mabel to a gallery opening, and something—maybe a need for change, maybe an addiction to danger—incites Mabel to go, now rocking a bob haircut.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

Strutting into the gallery in a ravishing orange shirt-dress, Mabel looks cool and confident, until her reverie is interrupted by an overeager “Bloody Mabel” fan who wants a selfie. (It would appear our favorite murder suspect now has a nickname.) Curator Alice rescues her from the embarrassing photo opp and proceeds to, slowly, unveil her ulterior motives: She wants Mabel for their artist collective, in part due to her new friend’s “natural talent” but also because, right now, she has “everyone’s attention.” The chemistry between these two is certainly bubbling, but it also seems obvious that Alice’s intentions for Mabel extend well beyond painting.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

As each of our protagonists contemplate these new opportunities, they discover an old podcasting champion is out for blood. The NPR legend Cinda Canning (Tina Fey) and her team of lackeys are developing their own podcast, Only Murderers In The Building, based entirely around the ongoing investigation of Charles, Oliver, and Mabel. The announcement and its accompanying insults, though broadcast over radio, feel so intimate to the trio that they each imagine Canning at home with them—in Charles’s bed, in Mabel’s living room, and leaning over Oliver’s writing desk. Fey is a delight in this sequence, her wry pompousness accented with a wink.

Mabel insists that “Cinda doesn’t even know what happened that night,” which, of course, begs the question: What did happen? Mabel doesn’t remember much—she was drunk on champagne—but she thinks Bunny said the word, “Fourteen.” That little tidbit isn’t much to go on, but it’s something, and the suspects now have extra motivation to clear their names. Screw Cinda Canning; Charles can’t lose Brazzos—or, uh, Uncle Brazzos!

Just as it seems they’re about to embark on season 2—meta very much intended—their conversation is cut short by Bunny’s disembodied voice telling Oliver to “fuck off.” Confused and disturbed, they hunt down the source of the noise and discover, inside Bunny’s apartment, a parrot mimicking Bunny’s voice. (I’m not convinced Bunny didn’t intentionally teach her bird to say, “Stuff it up your ass.”) Anyway, since they’ve already trespassed on Bunny’s apartment, they might as well look around, right? And destroy a few of Oliver’s nastily written notes along the way?

Before they get far, two other Arconia tenants, Uma (Jackie Hoffman) and Howard (Michael Cyril Creighton), walk in through the front door discussing Bunny’s eye for “erotic art”—in particular, an expensive Rose Cooper painting that’s very “balls-forward.” Uma’s looking to get it appraised, but, naturally, the painting is missing from Bunny’s apartment. The art thief couldn’t possibly be connected to the murder, right? When Charles returns to his own abode hours later, there it is, inexplicably: a portrait of his father and an unknown woman, naked, wrapped around each other in a fit of passion.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

That’s one hell of a way to end a premiere episode, and it’s tinged with Only Murders in the Building’s signature infusion of dark humor, quirky wit, and real emotional stakes. That’s a good sign the show’s sophomore chapter will be able to continue the momentum of its killer first season, but only if Only Murders doesn’t get too haughty in its pursuits. We all know what happens when big ideas fall apart in execution; just ask Oliver Putnam about Splash! The Musical.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Best Hair Color Removers 2022

What should we look for in a hair color remover?

Cassie Siskovic, of Alfaparf Milano Professional says the first step in figuring out what type of hair color remover to use is understanding the type of color you need to remove. “You can figure this out by thinking through your hair color history, and then making a decision with this in mind,” she says.

Before moving forward with removing hair color at home, Siskovic recommends thinking about the following:

  • If you used a pastel color conditioner on your highlights/lighter hair.
  • If you used a color/received color that went darker than you expected.
  • If you’ve been coloring your hair for years and want to make a change.

If you fall under example one or two, you could remove your hair color with a clarifying shampoo. “Usually, in these cases, the outer layer of your hair (the cuticle layer) is already open because your hair has been bleached or colored,” she adds. Since the cuticle is already open, the color you want to remove has a good chance of coming out easily.

If you fall under example 3, it’s likely clarifying your hair won’t remove your color. “The more consistent you are with hair color, whether it’s the same color or if you change it, the more stained or pigment loaded your hair becomes,” Siskovic explains. At that point, the best option for you may be to head to a salon.

What should we avoid?

Siskovic suggests avoiding any at-home chemicals, bleaches, dish soaps and detergents. “You’ve seen the horror videos on TikTok of people pulling out chunks of their hair due to damage — we deserve better than that,” she says. It’s best to try a safer method, like using a clarifying shampoo, or visiting a salon you trust.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Jennifer Lopez Shared Some Selfies of Her In a Bubble Bath

On Friday, JLO Beauty shared an intimate clip of their founder Jennifer Lopez in their Instagram Stories. In the short glimpse into her life, fans could see Lopez enjoying a very bubbly bubble bath and modeling her incredibly smooth skin.

The 52-year-old actress released a skincare line made with olive oil, and often presents her own youthful complexion as evidence that these products do what they promise. In the tub, she smiles for the camera, glowing from every angle.

JLO BeautyInstagram

A lot has happened for Lopez this year already, even before the launch of her new line. She released a movie, Marry Me, starring across from Owen Wilson in the playful romantic comedy. She became engaged to her boyfriend Ben Affleck for the second time, decades after their original engagement.

And soon, her new documentary Halftime will be coming out on Netflix. The film’s title is a nod to Lopez being in her fifties and a reference to her stand out Super Bowl Halftime Show with Shakira. In the documentary, she talks about facing scrutiny when she first found success in Hollywood because of her curves and being Latina.

“There were many times where I was just like, I think I’m just going to quit. I had to really figure out who I was. And believe in that and not believe in anything else,” she says. “When I started working, the beauty ideal was very thin, blonde, tall, not a lot of curves…I grew up around women with curves so it was nothing I was ever ashamed of. It was hard, when you think people think you’re a joke—like a punchline.”

At the time, Affleck even asked her is it bothered her after observing the constant criticism.

“‘I’m Latina, I’m a woman, I expected this,’” she replied.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Step Inside Tiffany’s ‘Vision & Virtuosity’ Exhibition

In the immortal words of the late, great Audrey Hepburn, “I’m just CRAZY about Tiffany’s!” To be honest, aren’t we all? Thankfully, London’s Saatchi Gallery is making all our wildest jewelry dreams come true by giving a home to the house’s traveling “Vision & Virtuosity” exhibition, open now through August 19. Featuring 400 archival pieces and Tiffany-adjacent items, from the original Breakfast at Tiffany’s script to the first-ever Blue Book—the O.G. Tiffany & Co. catalog—a deep dive into the history of what is arguably the jewelry world’s most illustrious brand is the perfect way to mark its 150th anniversary since arriving in the British capital.

Regarding the title of the exhibition, “Vision is the concept that an artist or creative person has an inkling, a spark of a concept or idea that hasn’t happened before…and has the boldness to realize it,” curator Christopher Young exclusively tells ELLE.com. “Virtuosity, on the other hand, is the excellence of the ability to do that—incredible craftsmanship, incredible materials.” The duality of vision and virtuosity is inextricably linked to Tiffany’s founder, Charles Lewis Tiffany, who first dreamed up the idea of fancy store in New York City that sells exotic goods from overseas, like sapphires and Mississippi River pearls.

Tickets for “Vision & Virtuosity” are currently available on the Tiffany & Co. Exhibition app, available on the iOS and Google Play app stores. If you can’t make it across the pond, take a look inside the exhibition here.

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Why Kourtney Kardashian Isn’t Happy With How Her Scott Disick Drama Has Been Edited

On The Kardashians, the family’s new Hulu reality series, Kourtney Kardashian’s relationship with Travis Barker and the anguish it has caused Scott Disick, her ex-boyfriend and father of her children, have been major plot points. But in the latest episode of the show, Kardashian lamented to her friend Steph Shepherd that, in reality, the Disick drama is much more minor in her life, and the show is being editing in a way that misrepresents the situation.

“[Travis and I] film and have the best time ever, and then we’ve been watching the edits, and it’s been so annoying because they’re swirling us in with this Scott drama,” Kardashian told Shepherd, via BuzzFeed.

Kardashian was particularly upset with her relationship with Disick overshadowing her engagement during the episode Barker proposed to her. “While shooting our show, we are all executive producers, so we get to see cuts of the show and give notes on the episodes and make sure our stories are being told,” she said. “I am in one of the best places I’ve ever been in my life, and it’s time for our show to catch up.”

“That night [Barker proposed to me], I wasn’t like, ‘God, everyone’s such fucking assholes for bringing up this [Disick’s reaction] because it wasn’t a part of the night. It was like two seconds of the night. I didn’t even remember it until I saw a cut of the episode,” she added. (In the episode, Kendall Jenner accused Kardashian of not having sympathy for Disick and how he felt about her moving on and marrying Barker rather than him.)

In a confessional, Kardashian added that the way the show was edited is “enabling this old narrative and buying into something that doesn’t really exist.” She continued, “It should be an empowering episode about me getting out of toxic relationships and really having this fairytale love story that is my reality.”

With the Disick stuff in particularly, Kardashian told Shepherd, “I wish they would take that out and put it in the next episode, and give us our respect and let us have our moment. I’m like, ‘Why is the fairytale not being told? Like, how could this be taken negatively?’” She added that she and Disick “have been broken up for seven years,” and she’s “allowed to create new memories and new ways of doing things.”

You can read the full recap of Kardashian’s conversation on BuzzFeed.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Check out our Latest News and Follow us at Facebook

Original Source

Exit mobile version